| Author |
 Replies: 34 / Views: 3,912 |
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
May I get confirmation of my ID please? Sc# 676 1946 A57 $100 on 8c 01 wuchang  |
Send note to Staff 
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3224 Posts |
|
|
Above is definitely Scott #676. |
|
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by hy-brasil - 06/26/2017 7:35 pm |
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
355 Posts |
|
|
rod222,
It is surprising to me that the the 3rd stamp cannot be found in SG, it is SC#5L43. The three major stamp catalogs seem never talk to each other.
|
|
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by TangStamps - 06/30/2017 10:23 pm |
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Quote:
It is surprising to me that the the 3rd stamp cannot be found in SG, it is SC#5L43. The three major stamp catalogs seem never talk to each other.
Hello Tang, please excuse my ignorance, I cannot understand your relevence, I make 5L43 a $1 on $10 ? Can you clarify please. I am having trouble with the stamps around my example, esp with the secret mark, trying to get image examples so I can have a visual reference. |
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
2156 Posts |
|
|
More China! Can anyone help identify these four please? They seem to turn up quite often but I can never remember what they are. If you have Gibbons numbers, they would be greatly appreciated.   |
|
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by jimjamtwo - 07/01/2017 01:44 am |
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
2156 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3224 Posts |
|
|
Upper left and lower left revenues are from Port Arthur & Dairen, an area controlled by both the Russians and Chinese communists, so those are more like pre-PRC to early PRC. They likely date somewhere between 1949 and 1955. SG lists Port Arthur and Dairen after the PRC issues, under Chinese Provinces with a subheading Manchuria, then a sub-sub heading for Port Arthur and Dairen. |
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Unknown to me. It looks as if the brilliant site chinarevenuestamps dot com has lost all its images. The Black appears to be the Liu-Ho Pagoda The Orange Fu Hsin Gwan Best I can do. Some more opinions : https://goscf.com/t/27590#27590 |
|
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by rod222 - 07/01/2017 05:28 am |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
2156 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6756 Posts |
|
|
Rod, you give me far more credit than I deserve -- I actually don't collect revenues, so everything I post about Asian revenues should be taken with several shakers of salt.
All four are ROC revenues. Since Hy-brasil has already IDed the left two...
Rod has actually already IDed the design in the other two stamps.
Top right is revenue showing Fu-Hsin (modern Fuxing) Pass, used in mid-1940s. Sorry, I don't know date of issue.
Bottom right is surcharged 20c over 2c Liu-Ho Pagoda. Don't know time period of usage, but my "guess" would also be 1940s.
The right two stamps are of same basic design of the General Revenue Issues of the 1930s, but have a different inscription for the right 4 characters in the top tablet. I'm not sure of the issue date for the revised inscription, not to mention the surcharge.
|
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6756 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3224 Posts |
|
|
No, they don't. I was just trying to give the spot where the revenues could be placed. |
|
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by hy-brasil - 07/01/2017 8:30 pm |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
2156 Posts |
|
|
Replies: 34 / Views: 3,912 |
|
Posted 06/26/2017 3:49 pm
