Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1899-1900 Ecuador Cinco Centavo Surcharge On Officia O3 Pkls

Next Page    
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 16 / Views: 2,885Next Topic
Page: of 2
Pillar Of The Community

United States
548 Posts
Posted 06/02/2011   3:54 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add fincbob2451 to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Hello everybody, I looked at the Scott catalog for a good 45 minutes and cannot find this stamp. It has the same design as the 1898-1899 Official O3. I do not see this surcharge nor a listing for a 5c over a 4c. I tried the SCF search engine and have come up with no answer. I hope I haven't just overlooked it in my search. Olease help to identify ir.
many thanks
David



Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
United States
7075 Posts
Posted 06/02/2011   6:35 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Cjd to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Your stamp shows up in the Forbin catalogue as Ecuador #108, which means it was considered a revenue at that time. Scott doesn't list it as a postage stamp, but a specialized catalogue for Ecuador would be helpful, and might shed light on it. (I don't have such a thing.)
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
548 Posts
Posted 06/02/2011   6:58 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add fincbob2451 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Cjd, Thank you very much for that infprmation. I am curiouzs as to why Scott doesn't list it. Any ideas?
Thanks again
David
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 06/02/2011   9:36 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I believe it to be postal fiscal 1900

SGF70 5c on 4c orange
minimal CV
but a great cover indeed, love it!


PS great thread heading

The postmark Guayaquil is rather interesting
during a fire in 1902 large quantities
of stamps were nicked from govt stores.
most of stocks were revenues
so prov auth were instructed to apply special control marks
(see gibbobs catalogue)
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by rod222 - 06/02/2011 9:40 pm
Pillar Of The Community
United States
548 Posts
Posted 06/02/2011   9:51 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add fincbob2451 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
rod222, That is fantastik, I have been trying to find a website about this most of the evening. Somebody always comes through and I appreciate it. Is there any reason why Scott doesn't list this stamp?
Many thanks
David
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 06/02/2011   10:01 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Maybe Scott does David,
somewhere back of book
or after the general listings
then listed as postal fiscals,
I am not au-fait with Scott,
I have the CDRom but never use it.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
548 Posts
Posted 06/02/2011   10:17 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add fincbob2451 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Gotcha rod222, Thanks again
David
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
7075 Posts
Posted 06/02/2011   10:33 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Cjd to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Scott doesn't generally list revenue stamps, other than U.S. issues. When the editors think they have evidence of valid postal use of revenue stamps, then they will (might?) list the stamp. Scott's editors just aren't consistent enough in their practices to draw a firm conclusion about postal usage of any unlisted stamp.

Yours certainly appears to the untrained eye to be a postal usage, but beyond that, more specialized information would seem to be necessary to know if it was common, uncommon, or a mistake.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
548 Posts
Posted 06/03/2011   12:27 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add fincbob2451 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks again cjd. Is Scott a good all around catalog to use or is there a better one?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
978 Posts
Posted 06/03/2011   04:16 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jbcev80 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Hi

I looked in my Minkus and Scott and could not find the revenue overprint. I am pretty sure it is listed by Scott as I have seen it before. I'll have to look in my material.

Rodney: The overprint is not one of the fire control marks. I just made a new post with the marks that are known (I thought I had posted this once before but I could not find it): https://goscf.com/t/15775

Jerry B
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 06/03/2011   04:28 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
G'day Jerry, no not a fire marking,
because it was two years prior to the theft / fire.
fincbob's is an official opt of 1900
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
978 Posts
Posted 06/03/2011   09:17 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jbcev80 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
G'Day Rodney

I do not believe that it is an official. Also the design for Scott O3 is the issue of 1881 overprinted Oficial on a slant from bottom left to upper right. That official was issued in 1896 and was a 5c blue (SG O20-O25). Note the fiscal stamp is dated 1899-1900.

As far as I know Ecuador official stamps have Oficial overprinted in some manner on the stamp. If I am wrong I would like to see some documentation showing it as an official. That way I can learn something new, no one knows everything.

If you have a SG that has South America in it there is a good depiction of the Fire Control Marks after Ecuador SG212 (it may be only in the specialized part 20).

Meanwhile, I am still digging as this intrigues me. As I said I think I have seen it before. If I find something I'll post back.


Jerry B
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
978 Posts
Posted 06/03/2011   09:32 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jbcev80 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Rodney,

I have to apologize to you. I did not read your post close enough. I totally forgot about that SG section.

In my 1989 Part 20 the stamp is SG F69 5c on 4c. F70 is a 10c on 5c on 50c dull purple.

The Fiscal stamps are not Official stamps. They were overprinted for use as regular postage.

Jerry B (now happy camper)
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
978 Posts
Posted 06/03/2011   09:38 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jbcev80 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Hi fincbob2451,

If you are going to specialize in Latin America then SG Part 20 (South America) and SG Part 15 (Central America) catalogs are a good addition to Scott. If a single Latin country, most countries have specialized catalogs (mostly written in Spanish).

Jerry B
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 06/03/2011   09:43 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Heh!
see, we can still stump the experts Jerry


You saved me posting the catalogue page :)

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
978 Posts
Posted 06/03/2011   10:00 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jbcev80 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Rodney,

Point well taken.

I had a friend (expert on Colombia) who plated a Colombian lithographed issue. I have a copy of a stamp where one of the value tablets is inverted. I showed it to him and the final theory was that there was another unknown lithograph stone. So it is not too hard to stump an expert.

Again thanks for the reminder of the SG section.

Jerry B
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Page: of 2 Previous TopicReplies: 16 / Views: 2,885Next Topic  
Next Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.21 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05