Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Mexico Ids Please

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 7 / Views: 1,421Next Topic  
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
2156 Posts
Posted 06/02/2011   8:26 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add jimjamtwo to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Here are five stamps I've been unable to identify. The first one is apparently from 1923, but all the other examples of this stamp I have are rouletted. This one has perfs, so presumably has a different catalogue number and CV:



Here's the other four:









All assistance/information greatly appreciated!
Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
United States
2547 Posts
Posted 06/02/2011   10:10 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Russ to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
First is 1934 Scott 690, Third is 1934 Scott 714, Last 2 are airmail 1934 Scott C69, C68
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
2156 Posts
Posted 06/02/2011   10:34 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jimjamtwo to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks, Russ. Are they all minimum CV?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2547 Posts
Posted 06/03/2011   12:56 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Russ to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
My Scott Worldwide is 1960 and probably won't help. Someone with a newer cat will probably give recent values. For reference they were 5 cents for 690, C68, C69 and 3 cents for 714.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
2156 Posts
Posted 06/03/2011   12:57 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jimjamtwo to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks, Russ!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
978 Posts
Posted 06/03/2011   03:07 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jbcev80 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Hi jimjamtwo,

To really say which these are one has to check the watermarks, perfs and color, especially the last airmail. It will make a difference.

If you e-mail me I can send you a table I made for Mexico which will help in identifying these issues. In the e-mail header put SCF-Mexico so it will not go in the dumper.

Jerry B
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
729 Posts
Posted 06/05/2011   8:28 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add danko to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Hi jbcev80

You know I would really appreciate if you email one to me. I have a lot of trouble with the Mexican stamps, with all those watermarks it just drives me nuts
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
2156 Posts
Posted 06/05/2011   9:11 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jimjamtwo to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
@jbcev80

Thanks for the offer - I'll be in touch!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 7 / Views: 1,421Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.17 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05