Take this as a guess as I'm sure someone with more knowledge will be by. I think this is an India stamp either Scott #108 from 1926-36 and would have a watermark, or 139 from 1934 and I don't believe this one has a watermark. Both used are minimum in value.
Ah wt1 beats me again and with a specific number. At least I was close. Oh oh I see my mistake. Yeah helps to look closer before responding. It could only be the 139 because it is missing the words "& revenue". Am I right wt1?
Seems right to me. I'm not a specialist in stamps from India, so I'm by far no expert, but the #139 seemed to be the only design that matched the initial scan when I pulled out my catalog.
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited. Privacy Policy / Terms of UseAdvertise Here
Posted 01/20/2012 07:56 am
