Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Ireland Scott 59?

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 10 / Views: 1,717Next Topic  
Moderator
Learn More...
United States
5094 Posts
Posted 11/04/2012   12:29 am  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add Partime to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Looking for confirmation here. My Scott's says that the Harrison & Sons printing of 1923 would have the second "e" of "eireann" slightly raised, the lower end of the 1 slightly rounded, and the inner loop of the 9 is also round. I think I see all of that here, but faintly. The "e" looks like it is raised compared to the "r", but not to the next letter. Can the Irish experts confirm? Thanks in advance.

Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
Canada
1155 Posts
Posted 11/04/2012   01:17 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add irishjack to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Looks right the 1 is rounded and 2nd e is raised.
this site might be helpfull to you, aIts my go to http://www.gbos.org.uk/index.php/Country_List/21
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6756 Posts
Posted 11/04/2012   01:29 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add khj to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The "e" is not a good test.

A better test is the "9" (my opinion). I would say yours is oval, so it is the 1922 printing (Ireland #44 in the Scott catalog). In the "9" of the 1923 printings, the inner loop is almost a circle.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by khj - 11/04/2012 01:43 am
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6756 Posts
Posted 11/04/2012   01:39 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add khj to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Many of the 1923 overprints being offered for sale are mis-IDed. The better-known dealers are the only ones who consistently ID it correctly.

Here is an example of the 1923 overprint. Notice the roundness of the inside loop of the "9".



If you are looking for the tall "1" variety (not shown above), it's actually the bottom of the "1" that extends below the baseline. It's really "longer", rather than "taller".
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Moderator
Learn More...
United States
5094 Posts
Posted 11/04/2012   01:44 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Partime to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks to both. Based on your comments and looking at that excellent link, it is obviously the 1922 version, and not the raised "e" rounded inner circle version. Yet again, the SCF answers my questions.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6756 Posts
Posted 11/04/2012   01:47 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add khj to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
You're welcome!

Irishjack, that is an excellent link. I've not seen that website before. Thanks for posting the link!!

k
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
1155 Posts
Posted 11/04/2012   01:49 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add irishjack to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The 44 is a shiny blue-black overprint , The 59 is overprinted in blue-black ink, Hard to say if its shiny from the scan.
Also on the 44 the 1 on 1922 the bottom is flat on the 59 it is slightly rounded yours appears slightly rounded,
But I no expert on these
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6756 Posts
Posted 11/04/2012   02:08 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add khj to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I agree that the base of the "1" is not completely flat in Partime's stamp.

The problem with any flat/round test is that the overprint device suffers wear and tear over time. The sharp "flat" parts might get "not-so-flat" or "not so sharp" over time. Other problems as well, such as incomplete inking... If the base of the "1" were flat, then I would say it is 1922 for sure. I have a problem using the round "1" as the primary test. While the 1923 overprints clearly have a round "1", I'm not convinced that many of the 1922 overprints don't also exhibit characteristics of not-so-sharp "1".

This is why I usually use the oval/round inner loop in the "9" as the primary test.

I am open to correction if others see it differently.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by khj - 11/04/2012 02:10 am
Moderator
Learn More...
United States
5094 Posts
Posted 11/04/2012   02:53 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Partime to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Boy, I will tell you that unless your "e" is much higher than anything else, or the bottom of the "1" is obviously round, it is very difficult to see. I found another that I thought was a Scott 59, but it just appears to be slightly overinked. There are subtle differences in each of the letters (look at the serifs on the S's, for example), but in my second stamp, the circle in the "9" is improved, but still not a circle ... merely an oval. This is one overprint that is pretty difficult to tell. I haven't tried a light yet to see if the color is visible under magnification. That is next on my list.

My second stamp is shown below.



Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1510 Posts
Posted 11/09/2012   12:43 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Timm to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
May I suggest that you look through the Wolfe Collection of Irish postage Stamps available on line.

http://www.rarebooks.nd.edu/digital/stamps/irish/

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6756 Posts
Posted 11/09/2012   01:33 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add khj to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Nice link, Timm! Thanks for posting the link.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 10 / Views: 1,717Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.17 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05