| Author |
 Replies: 7 / Views: 1,488 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
38 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
India
186 Posts |
|
|
Well I have the 2012 Scott Classic Catalogue and this shows up as a 200 too. |
Send note to Staff 
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
38 Posts |
|
|
Well that's good. Must be a misprint on the ad, or maybe they're using a different catalog? |
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
India
186 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
3547 Posts |
|
|
Probably a Michel number, from the look of it. Good idea to remember that, while North America may use Scott, the rest of the worlkd tends to use its own catalogues. |
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2941 Posts |
|
|
Michel doesn't generally use letter prefixes. In Michel, that's a 194, which is also what's indicated on the paper next to the stamp. Looks like the seller made a mistake in the listing. |
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
2333 Posts |
|
|
To me, it's clear that it's a Michel Cat. Nr. on the last line you can read "Mi€", that is "Michel Cat. Value in euros (€)".
It should be remembered that Michel is the reference cat. in Central/Eastern Europe (the seller is in Latvia), while in Western/South Europe, we use Yvert et Tellier and in UK and Commowealth it's SG the most used catalog. |
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
1865 Posts |
|
|
This is certainly not the Michel Cat. Nr. Michel B27 was a miniature sheet issued in 1995. The seller seems to have confused the 1924 Arms set (which his stamp came from) with the Pro Juventute Arms set of 1923, which contains Scott #B27. |
|
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by 22crows - 02/18/2013 7:39 pm |
|
| |
Replies: 7 / Views: 1,488 |
|
Posted 02/17/2013 5:34 pm
