| Author |
Replies: 44 / Views: 10,412 |
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
786 Posts |
|
|
 I found these in a packet bought in Hong Kong some 30 years ago on liberty. They are early China and after hours of SC searching cannot come up with a SC# or value. Left to Right: #1 Is a light red & #2 is a chocolate brown. Neither has a numerical value but I believe the lower left box has the Chinese numerical character. I do not recognize the portrait figure in any of the SC illustrations. #3 is an overprint 3.00 of 5.00 (blue on blue) similar to China SC#917 (which is similar in design but 3.00 over 50.00). any 
|
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
1918 Posts |
|
|
First an second are Postal Saving stamps. I don't think they are in Scott. Issued in 1944 in the province of ChungKing and have the portrait of president Lin Sen. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
786 Posts |
|
|
Thank you jorgesurcl. Appreciate the information. I think I can find the numeric character translation in the Scott. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
786 Posts |
|
|
Second Try: Subject matter Stamps still an issue for me. Can anyone help with catalog # and value. It would be greatly appreciated. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
New Member
China
1 Posts |
|
|
The last one is Revenue Stamp Surcharged as "Gold Yuan " Postage Stamp. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6756 Posts |
|
|
The picture is blurry, but the stamp at right does look like $3 on "$50", not $5. Please look at it under a magnifier -- the blue surcharge may be playing tricks with your eyes. You should see 50 followed by a smaller elevated and underlined double zero. If the surcharge is blue, then your stamp is Scott China #916, not #917(black surcharge).
The 2 Lin Sen postal savings stamps on the left are 50c and $5 denominations (from left to right). You are missing the $1 and $2 stamps. They are fairly common, as postal savings stamps go.
k |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
786 Posts |
|
|
khj:
Thanks you for the info on the savings stamps.
As for the right surcharged I looked under the glass and it is a $3 over $5 in blue. The last 00's are small raised-under-lined with the overprint in 'navy' blue (but really appears black.) I have the $3 over $50 and that definitely appears more black than blue. I appreciate the assist and information but still left with the mystery. I will scan both stamps later and post to this thread in the future. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6756 Posts |
|
|
There are several revenue values for that stamp that are not in Scott (since Scott doesn't list non-postal revenues). Since you looked at again, I guess the surcharge was playing tricks on my eyes. The unsurcharged $5 does exist.
Since the stamp was originally a revenue stamp, there is a possibility that it is a revenue surcharge (i.e., not valid for postage, only for revenue use). I don't have a revenue catalog and I can't make out the text in the overprint. I can check Yang's liberation area catalog to see if it might be a regional surcharge. |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by khj - 12/23/2013 1:57 pm |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6756 Posts |
|
|
I flipped through my Yang Volume 2 (6th Edition) and did not see any $3 on $5 Transportation surcharges in it.
Nor do I see it on the China Revenue website (but that site does not give a complete listing).
Hopefully someone with a revenue catalog, a more specialized catalog, or the knowledge can chime in.
Interesting stamp, never seen a $3 on $5 one; thanks for posting the pic (yes, it would be nice if you could post a clearer pic).
k |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
786 Posts |
|
|
Moderator

United States
5094 Posts |
|
|
Those "3's" in the $3 look surprisingly different. I've got a few at home that I will look at this evening. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
786 Posts |
|
|
Partime: Good eye-didn't see that. The $50 '3' is a rounded top and the '00's look fatter (?) than the $5 '3', which has a 'flat-top'. I noticed in the beginning that the over-print was crisper in the $5 type, but I thought that was from a newer plate and a relatively new inking of the plate.
Just as a note of purchase history, I purchased these in 1971 from a stamp shop in Hong Kong (still under British)for short $$s. But this was significantly before the resurgence of CHINA (PRC) collectables. I stored them in their original glassine and a cigar box until this past spring. Scott has some good info but really not enough to identify completely. I am hoping that there is someone in the Forum (especially Asia/China collectors) that could enlighten me as to SC# (or other reference) and value. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Moderator

United States
5094 Posts |
|
|
OK, I found the following in Grandma's collection. I believe that these are China, Scott 916 and 917 which are Blue on Dark Blue, and Black on Dark Blue. Note that they are definitely both 50_00 stamps ... not 5_00. However, my Scott's doesn't explain the difference in the "3". Scott's value in 2012 was only US$0.20 each.  |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by Partime - 12/24/2013 03:11 am |
|
|
Moderator

United States
5094 Posts |
|
|
I also have one that I cannot locate anywhere. The date seems to indicate 1949, but I just can't tell. Any ideas?  |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6756 Posts |
|
|
Partime, your $5 stamp is East China #5L13(Apr1949). The normal stamp has the black overprint; the error stamp has the overprint missing and there is a uncommon purple overprint variety.
The stamp is already a valid postage stamp, so the postal overprint was not used to convert a revenue stamp to postage stamp. Rather, the overprint was used to mask the Japanese flag that had been included at the top of the tower. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6756 Posts |
|
|
Partime, you correctly identified the two transport revenue surcharges as #916(left) and #917(right) in the Scott catalog. The stamps were printed by several printers. Your two stamps were made by different printers. Although I don't know the exact history, I would assume that the different printers were also authorized to make the overprints -- hence differences in the border, font, spacing... of the surcharge. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
Replies: 44 / Views: 10,412 |
|