Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Unknown China Stamps

Next Page    
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 44 / Views: 10,412Next Topic
Page: of 3
Pillar Of The Community
United States
786 Posts
Posted 10/23/2013   11:26 am  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add eligies to your friends list Get a Link to this Message



I found these in a packet bought in Hong Kong some 30 years ago on liberty. They are early China and after hours of SC searching cannot come up with a SC# or value.

Left to Right:

#1 Is a light red & #2 is a chocolate brown. Neither has a numerical value but I believe the lower left box has the Chinese numerical character. I do not recognize the portrait figure in any of the SC illustrations. #3 is an overprint 3.00 of 5.00 (blue on blue) similar to China SC#917 (which is similar in design but 3.00 over 50.00). any
Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
1918 Posts
Posted 10/23/2013   10:48 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jorgesurcl to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
First an second are Postal Saving stamps.
I don't think they are in Scott.
Issued in 1944 in the province of ChungKing and have the portrait of president Lin Sen.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
786 Posts
Posted 10/24/2013   10:55 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add eligies to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thank you jorgesurcl. Appreciate the information. I think I can find the numeric character translation in the Scott.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
786 Posts
Posted 12/19/2013   3:08 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add eligies to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Second Try: Subject matter Stamps still an issue for me. Can anyone help with catalog # and value. It would be greatly appreciated.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
New Member
China
1 Posts
Posted 12/22/2013   02:12 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add sharkck to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The last one is Revenue Stamp Surcharged as "Gold Yuan " Postage Stamp.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6756 Posts
Posted 12/22/2013   03:31 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add khj to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The picture is blurry, but the stamp at right does look like $3 on "$50", not $5. Please look at it under a magnifier -- the blue surcharge may be playing tricks with your eyes. You should see 50 followed by a smaller elevated and underlined double zero. If the surcharge is blue, then your stamp is Scott China #916, not #917(black surcharge).

The 2 Lin Sen postal savings stamps on the left are 50c and $5 denominations (from left to right). You are missing the $1 and $2 stamps. They are fairly common, as postal savings stamps go.

k
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
786 Posts
Posted 12/23/2013   12:35 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add eligies to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
khj:

Thanks you for the info on the savings stamps.

As for the right surcharged I looked under the glass and it is a $3 over $5 in blue. The last 00's are small raised-under-lined with the overprint in 'navy' blue (but really appears black.) I have the $3 over $50 and that definitely appears more black than blue. I appreciate the assist and information but still left with the mystery. I will scan both stamps later and post to this thread in the future.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6756 Posts
Posted 12/23/2013   1:41 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add khj to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
There are several revenue values for that stamp that are not in Scott (since Scott doesn't list non-postal revenues). Since you looked at again, I guess the surcharge was playing tricks on my eyes. The unsurcharged $5 does exist.

Since the stamp was originally a revenue stamp, there is a possibility that it is a revenue surcharge (i.e., not valid for postage, only for revenue use). I don't have a revenue catalog and I can't make out the text in the overprint. I can check Yang's liberation area catalog to see if it might be a regional surcharge.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by khj - 12/23/2013 1:57 pm
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6756 Posts
Posted 12/23/2013   2:07 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add khj to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I flipped through my Yang Volume 2 (6th Edition) and did not see any $3 on $5 Transportation surcharges in it.

Nor do I see it on the China Revenue website (but that site does not give a complete listing).

Hopefully someone with a revenue catalog, a more specialized catalog, or the knowledge can chime in.

Interesting stamp, never seen a $3 on $5 one; thanks for posting the pic (yes, it would be nice if you could post a clearer pic).

k
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
786 Posts
Posted 12/23/2013   2:48 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add eligies to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply




I hope this can show the 2-types more clearly. I believe the $50 is BLACK and the $5 overprint is close to black, maybe NAVY BLUE??
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Moderator
Learn More...
United States
5094 Posts
Posted 12/23/2013   4:00 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Partime to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Those "3's" in the $3 look surprisingly different. I've got a few at home that I will look at this evening.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
786 Posts
Posted 12/23/2013   5:17 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add eligies to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Partime: Good eye-didn't see that. The $50 '3' is a rounded top and the '00's look fatter (?) than the $5 '3', which has a 'flat-top'. I noticed in the beginning that the over-print was crisper in the $5 type, but I thought that was from a newer plate and a relatively new inking of the plate.

Just as a note of purchase history, I purchased these in 1971 from a stamp shop in Hong Kong (still under British)for short $$s. But this was significantly before the resurgence of CHINA (PRC) collectables. I stored them in their original glassine and a cigar box until this past spring. Scott has some good info but really not enough to identify completely. I am hoping that there is someone in the Forum (especially Asia/China collectors) that could enlighten me as to SC# (or other reference) and value.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Moderator
Learn More...
United States
5094 Posts
Posted 12/24/2013   02:11 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Partime to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
OK, I found the following in Grandma's collection. I believe that these are China, Scott 916 and 917 which are Blue on Dark Blue, and Black on Dark Blue. Note that they are definitely both 50_00 stamps ... not 5_00. However, my Scott's doesn't explain the difference in the "3". Scott's value in 2012 was only US$0.20 each.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by Partime - 12/24/2013 03:11 am
Moderator
Learn More...
United States
5094 Posts
Posted 12/24/2013   02:27 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Partime to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I also have one that I cannot locate anywhere. The date seems to indicate 1949, but I just can't tell. Any ideas?

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6756 Posts
Posted 12/24/2013   03:22 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add khj to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Partime, your $5 stamp is East China #5L13(Apr1949). The normal stamp has the black overprint; the error stamp has the overprint missing and there is a uncommon purple overprint variety.

The stamp is already a valid postage stamp, so the postal overprint was not used to convert a revenue stamp to postage stamp. Rather, the overprint was used to mask the Japanese flag that had been included at the top of the tower.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6756 Posts
Posted 12/24/2013   03:27 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add khj to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Partime, you correctly identified the two transport revenue surcharges as #916(left) and #917(right) in the Scott catalog. The stamps were printed by several printers. Your two stamps were made by different printers. Although I don't know the exact history, I would assume that the different printers were also authorized to make the overprints -- hence differences in the border, font, spacing... of the surcharge.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Page: of 3 Previous TopicReplies: 44 / Views: 10,412Next Topic  
Next Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.38 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05