| Author |
Replies: 23 / Views: 4,576 |
|
Valued Member
United States
23 Posts |
|
|
First, a 70 year old use of a #207 ??? The envelope is in rough shape.   Next, a 6 cent Columbian Z margin single, registered from St. Louis to Canada.  A very dark Chester Hill, Ohio postmark. Not as clean as another I found, but I guess they used some good ink there. Is "12mo/30" written inside, as opposed to Dec/30? Another I found as reference > http://www.philamercury.com/covers.php?id=7544 Minneapolis Minn, Oct. 3, 1859. Three cents due? Very cool handwriting. I wish people didn't write all over them, as on the left side of the envelope. 
|
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1947 Posts |
|
|
THat is quite the anachronism on the first cover. Wonder if it caused any at the post office. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
1324 Posts |
|
|
Can you please show backstamps on Chester Hill cover? What is the anachronism? |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
7097 Posts |
|
|
Pretty neat covers! I really like the Registered cover in the center scan. Great stuff! |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2941 Posts |
|
|
Well I don't know what anachronism means but I think it's refering to a 19th century stamp being used in 1952 |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United Kingdom
1187 Posts |
|
|
Hi stampcrow. An anachronism is something out of its proper time, so you were correct in your assessment.
Terry |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
566 Posts |
|
|
I had never seen Min. as an abbreviation for Minnesota before seeing the cancellation on your Minneapolis cover. Does anyone else know if this was common for the period? |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
620 Posts |
|
|
Min. is common for the early statehood cancellations in the larger cities. The last territorial abreviation was Min T. So they just dropped the T. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1125 Posts |
|
|
The Chester Hill cover is "Quaker-dated." Likely that the postmaster was a Quaker. They did not use the "Roman" names of months, as they represented pagan gods. So, they used the month number - 12 month / 30 for December 30th. Worth a slight premium over regular-dated postmarks (but we're not talking round-the-world cruise money here - more like round-the-neighborhood cab ride). |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2941 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
23 Posts |
|
|
CanadaStamp: There's no backstamp on the Chester Hill
Thanks everyone for your input! |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
1324 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
23 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
23 Posts |
|
|
Another recent acquisition, a cover dated August 2nd 1862. Sent to MRS. Lieutenant George F French, care of Ralph Wright Esquire... From New Orleans...to Vermont. I could only assume what that letter contained. I purchased it on the cheap, because I thought it was an early pink/rose pair (the scan is darker than they appear), but they are well laid singles, and the New Orleans PM.  |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by coilfan - 01/22/2014 3:37 pm |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1624 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2555 Posts |
|
Replies: 23 / Views: 4,576 |
|