Quote:
It is interesting to note that the Slovenia issues were not specifically inscribe with their country name, unlike the Bosnia and Croatia.
I know what you mean; but as someone who lives both in the UK and in one of its constituent parts, I know that using the word 'country' in this kind of situation involves walking on eggshells.
I am confident that the government's major priority was that the name of the
country,
which was of course SHS, should appear on all the stamps. It did - with the exception of the ex-Bosnian newspaper stamps, which had never had any name on, and the 1919/20 stamps of Serbia, to which I shall return.
So long as that basic principle was adhered to, I doubt if they were too worried as to whether the stamp also bore the name of the
region in which it had been produced.
In Bosnia it did - that does not surprise me, given that their region had no mention in the SHS title!
In Croatia it did - that doesn't surprise me given the strength of nationalist/separatist feeling in Croatia, and the reservations they had about a Serbian monarch and a centralised government based in ex-Serbia.
In Slovenia it didn't - that doesn't surprise me, because Slovenia's desire had been primarily to get out of Austria, where Slavs were in a minority, rather than all-out independence.
The ones who, at first sight, might have been candidates for the Naughty Step are in fact the Serbians, none of whose post 1917 emissions has SHS on them. But in fact the bulk of these stamps were issued before (and therefore presumably set up
well before) the establishment of the SHS. After that no new plates were produced, and the 1919/20 issues were merely new printings from the old plates.