Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Sc#1700 Flag Over Inukshuk - Fluorescent Paper

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 2 / Views: 1,975Next Topic  
Valued Member

United States
11 Posts
Posted 05/07/2014   12:52 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add FGM to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
I have just recently finished inspecting about 5500 used copies of this issue and was trying to separate them into the 2 cataloged types (F back and NF back). However, I soon realized that I could easily find 3 distinct levels of fluorescence on the back of the stamps (NF, DF, F). When I turned them over to inspect the printed side, I again could easily separate them into these 3 levels. In fact the breakdown is NF 18%, DF 73% and F 9%. Since the Unitrade catalog didn't mention any different fluorescent levels for the printed side of the stamps, I had never checked the mint booklets. When I did, the 3 different fluorescent levels are very obvious.BK236/237 are DF, BK237A is F and BK237C is NF as shown in the photo (sorry about the quality...). Has anyone else noticed this? Also, I do not have BK236A, BK236B or BK237B so do not know where they fall into this. If anyone has these booklet and a UV lamp, I would appreciate feedback.
Cheers

Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
United States
1495 Posts
Posted 05/07/2014   5:26 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Trainwreck to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Is DF a separate variety? I always assumed when determining the back fluorescence on this stamp, it either fluoresced (F) or didn't (NF). Never thought to try determining fluorescent intensities (but then, my census of this issue is WAY BELOW 5500). Thanks for the analysis anyway--I'll have to look at these guys again.

Regards, Robert
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by Trainwreck - 05/07/2014 5:30 pm
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
644 Posts
Posted 05/07/2014   10:45 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add 3Dadeo to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
FGM,
Great work on this study. You should consider a membership in the Elizabethan II Study Group. This is the kind of study that is relevant to modern Canadian stamps.

I agree that there is a distinction between F, DF and NF. In fact many stamps in the Unitrade catalog are listed with all three papers.

You might also consider sending an e-mail to Robin Harris (editor of Unitrade Specialized Catalog of Canadian Stamps). He also manages and edits the Study Group/website.

http://www.adminware.ca/esg/index.htm
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 2 / Views: 1,975Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.16 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05