Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Soruth State - The Cuckoo In The Nest

Next Page    
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 16 / Views: 5,429Next Topic
Page: of 2
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
3547 Posts
Posted 07/23/2014   03:23 am  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add tonymacg to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Collectors will be familiar with overprints on stamps 'borrowed' from other countries, denoting changes of political status. However, borrowing from other countries without any change in status must be rather rarer - these are indeed 'cuckoos'in the nest.

In 1949, Soruth State in India was experiencing something of a postal crisis. It was running out of stamps. Its ruler had tried to join Pakistan in 1947, so the new Indian government wasn't particularly sympathetic to the State's problems. Soruth called in and surcharged all existing stocks of its own higher value stamps, but this still wasn't enough.

In desperation, Soruth turned to the neighbouring Sate of Bhavnagar, and borrowed a supply of 1 Anna (the current letter rate) revenue stamps of Bhavnagar. Soruth overprinted these for its own use, locally and in great haste. As might be expected, this created a field day for philatelists

Here is the basic, overprinted, stamp:



and a cover, showing that it wasn't just created for collectors



(wouldn't have been the first time an Indian State produced a stamp just for collectors This cover travelled from the capital, Junagadh, to the second town in the State, Veraval.)

Having used up all the high values by surcharging them, parcels created a bit of a problem:

Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
Australia
3547 Posts
Posted 07/23/2014   03:33 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add tonymacg to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Probably needless to say, the printers made some serious errors. Gibbons lists two:

'POSTAGE' omitted:



and the overprint double:



There were 40 positions in the overprint forme ... and at least 14 of them show some of the errors beloved of collectors.

There were missing stops after the letters U.S.S. ('United States of Saurashtra') all over the place. The top row of eight of the setting had no fewer than four missing stops. Here are a few:



From Row 1/3



and Row 1/4



and Row 1/5
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
3547 Posts
Posted 07/23/2014   04:26 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add tonymacg to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
There were also small and large letters dotted throughout.

Small 'S' in 'POSTAGE'



(Row 2/1)

Small 'N' in 'REVENUE'



(Row 2/7)

A small 'V' in 'REVENUE' occurred twice:



(Row 3/8)



(Row 5/5)


And there was even a large 'V' in 'REVENUE'



These stamps (SG 60) aren't too hard to find - and you've got quite a reasonable chance of turning up one of the printing errors undetected, too
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United Kingdom
544 Posts
Posted 07/23/2014   09:33 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Bamra1 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Soruth turned to the neighbouring State of Bhavnagar


But in 1949 when all this overprinting took place, Bhavnagar and Saurashtra/Soruth were not neighbouring states - they were one and the same state. The foundation of the United State of Saurashtra (USS on the overprints, although it was more usually known as the United State of Kathiawad) incorporated into a single state both Bhavnagar and the area roughly known as Saurashtra/Soruth, as well as others; strictly speaking Saurashtra/Soruth had previously been an approximate geographical area covering a number of independent states in Kathiawar and before 1948 there had never politically been a Saurashtra/Soruth State any more there had been a State of Scandinavia or a State of the Balkans.

The USS/USK was simply validating stamps previously belonging to one individual constituent for use in the whole of the new state. The new state of Rajastan did exactly the same with stamps of Bundi, Kishangarh and Jaipur.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by Bamra1 - 07/23/2014 09:37 am
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
3547 Posts
Posted 07/23/2014   09:47 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add tonymacg to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Quite right at the political level, but at the postal level, Soruth (or Saurashtra or Junagadh) remained distinct. You couldn't have used these Bhavnagar overprints in Bhavnagar.

Just as you couldn't use a, say, Kishangarh Rajasthan overprint in Jaipur or Bundi, or Dungarpur for that matter:



Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
5894 Posts
Posted 07/23/2014   12:26 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add smauggie to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Lovely presentation, Tony.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United Kingdom
544 Posts
Posted 07/23/2014   6:04 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Bamra1 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thank you. That is interesting information, and I sit corrected to study its implications.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
3547 Posts
Posted 07/23/2014   7:22 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add tonymacg to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
When I have a spare moment, I'll have a look at my Morvi, to see if any were used during the USK/USS period. Of course, Gibbons says that Morvi was merged on the 15 April 1948.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 07/04/2017   04:34 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Missing two periods? Row 1/4 ?

I have a feeling I have posted this before, unable to find it, however.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
India
557 Posts
Posted 07/04/2017   3:14 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Joy Daschaudhuri to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply


This Saurashtra 1949 U.S.S. REVENUE & POSTAGE SAURASHTRA on Bhavnagar 1940 1A Krishnakumarsinhji Bhavsinhji Gohil (1912-1965) purple court fee typograph (SG 60) comes from sheet position either R3/1(17) or from R8/1(57) which are characterized by the absence of stops after U and the 1st S of U.S.S..

R4/1 is charcterized by the ovpt. with P of POSTAGE being under V of REVENUE.

Rod, if you are interested mail me your e-mail address. I can send you the plating table of the U.S.S. ovpts. of Saurashtra 1949 1A SG 60. I cannot figure out how to send attachments thru the site e-mail.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
India
557 Posts
Posted 07/04/2017   3:25 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Joy Daschaudhuri to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The unoverprinted base stamp is Bhavnagar 1935 1A Krishnakumarsinhji Bhavsinhji Gohil (1912–1965) Köppel and Manners type 5 purple court fee typograph (K&M 131) (size: 2.8cm×3.7cm) with perf.11, printed on wove paper printed in sheets of 80 (8×10) by Waterlow and Sons, Limited, London, England.

The Gujarati inscriptions in the top panel read Bhavnagar Darbar and in the lower value panel the denomination as Ek Ano (One Ana). At the left of the ruler's profile is printed Court Fee and at the right Ticket in Gujarati.

This 1A denomination was primarily used to pay the basic letter postage 1A for every 29.15gm (2½ tola), the rate in effect from April 1,1943 to March 31,1950 when the Saurashtra State Post merged with the Indian Postal Service.

The stamp appears to have faint impression of either Malaviya type 22/Wood and Meher type PM28 or Malaviya type 25/Wood and Meher type PM29 cds of Junagarh.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 07/04/2017   6:56 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Thank you Joy,
email sent.

My collection of Soruth is very sparse, this will make a nice album page.


Quote:
The stamp appears to have faint impression of either Malaviya type 22/Wood and Meher type PM28 or Malaviya type 25/Wood and Meher type PM29 cds of Junagarh.


To which stamp are you referring, Joy ?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
India
557 Posts
Posted 07/05/2017   03:23 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Joy Daschaudhuri to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I have referred to the postmark types in relation to this specific Saurashtra 1949 1A SG 60 stamp [R3/1(17) or R8/1(57)].

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
India
557 Posts
Posted 07/05/2017   03:26 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Joy Daschaudhuri to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Rod, I have sent you the Saurahtra 1949 1A SG 60 U.S.S. ovpt. plating table as well as the scans of the relevant pages of Chapter IV: Barred Obliterators of "Cochin Postmarks and Cancellations" authored by Guna Balachandra Pai and published by Robson Lowe Limited, London, England (1974) which was due for some time since I did not have your e-mail address.

https://goscf.com/t/50688&whichpage=2#438180

Now say Thank you.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 07/05/2017   07:26 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Thank you indeed, Joy.
Havn't had time to peruse just yet, but look forward to it.

As many have said before, the generosity of the Philatelic community is legendary,
I am indebted.

Tony sent me some years ago, the Haiderabad (sic) numeral cancellations 1874-1898
and The Circlular cancllations of Jaipur State.
So my Indian Library is growing nicely.
Rod
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
3547 Posts
Posted 07/05/2017   07:34 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add tonymacg to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Here is the setting of the overprint on SG 60:

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Page: of 2 Previous TopicReplies: 16 / Views: 5,429Next Topic  
Next Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.2 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05