Goodness, CanadaStamp!
In July, I posted about self-defeating Nazi racist buffoonery, and you found it 'somewhat offensive'.
Q/ Did you ever read the referenced newspaper article?
https://goscf.com/t/38377#328694And, here I use the term 'The Great War', for many years the common name of that war, and I am propagating a 'militarist propaganda device'.
(The reason, BTW, is that I eschew 'WW1' & 'WW2', as I decline to recognize that much a disconnect between them.)
(I also prefer the archaic usage, being a little archaic, myself.)
The iconic American recruiting poster/slogan was 'I WANT YOU FOR U.S. ARMY', not 'I WANT YOU FOR THE GREAT WAR', even though the posters were printed 3 years into the war, and almost 3 years after the Macleans article (above).
In any case, I did not use the term to offend, and remain innocent of its use to promote the 'social atrocity'.
Lastly, a gift for those who've read so far:
http://www.economist.com/blogs/econ...ist-explains Why the first world war wasn't really
Cheers,
/s/ ikeyPikey