Quote:
Silly me. I thought the article gave actual examples of kids, including high school students, initially doubtful, finding stamps interesting. But with hardened pessimism reigning serenely here, I can see how naive I was to take the article at face value.
I'll do better next time. I promise.
You are probably referring to my post as being pessimistic so I'll respond. I enjoy stamp collecting and my son finds stamps interesting. I never said their weren't children that find it enjoyable and engaging. I'm merely pointing out there are other activities that meet those five benefits mentioned in the article.
Being a parent of two children with wide interests I recognize that their time is more precious than commonly thought in these discussions. While maybe they could spend more time collecting stamps, I'd actually be happier if they learned to play a musical instrument at an advanced level, played on an A level soccer team or learned software development skills. They can acquire an interest in collecting in other ways, as well, and I am perfectly happy with that. One such activity is collecting Pokemon cards, with the added benefit that they actually play this highly strategic game. My job as apparent is to foster diverse interests.
I'm sorry if that sounds pessimistic. That's reality in my family. My children have been exposed to stamp collecting, participate occasionally, understand the joy of a collecting hobby, even if it is not stamps but collectable cards. One day, when something as tame (I originally used the word dull) as stamp collecting becomes more attractive than competing interests, as it did for me when I reached adulthood, hopefully they will find it interesting and take a deeper dive.
The point I'm trying to make is those five benefits can be achieved by many activities including digital based activities. What is important is they develop the skills that are important for their lives. They can be introduced to many activities, including stamp collecting, and if parents do a good job of fostering diverse activities, set a proper example, and participate in things they are also interested in, they will probably turn out okay and maybe adopt some of the parents interests as well.
A good example of how not to parent. A friend of my son came to our house and saw that I have 250+ board games and a large collection of video games and gaming consoles and was astounded. He was amazed that I was a gamer, that I played video games with my kids and board games as well. When he saw that both my wife and I had Pokemon cards and had created Pokemon decks and competed in local tournaments he almost had a stroke. Why? Because his parents take no interest in what their children find interesting.
So my other point is that the best way to get a child interested in the parent's hobbies or interests is to take a genuine interest in theirs. Hieronymous, one of your earlier posts said that video games and web surfing had deleterious effects. I say that your myopic view of the interests of the younger generation is what has the most deleterious effect on stamp collecting. That and the propensity for some parents to use TV and digital devices as a means to keep their children occupied while they pursue adult interests.
Sure exposing kids to the joys of stamp collecting is great. But you better be exploring and participating in the interests of the younger generation as well.