A practical example:
Gibbons list this imperf pair of the Bhopal ˝ Anna green of 1944-7 imperf

as '†' mint but priced used.
That suggests that Gibbons believe no mint copies of the stamp imperf survived - that all the imperf copies were used, like this. As there was probably only the single imperf sheet in the first place, and the entire sheet was probably used on correspondence, Gibbons are probably right to rate it '†' mint. I'd be
very suspicious of a mint pair, anyway.