Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Canada Perforation Change From 1962

Previous Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 36 / Views: 7,255Next Topic
Page: of 3
Pillar Of The Community
3859 Posts
Posted 07/24/2015   10:44 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jogil to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
New: The perforation change that started in 1962 has also affected a centennial stamp as well but in the opposite way. Centennial stamps are supposed to be new perforation 12 (11.85) but the booklet pane Scott/Unitrade 458a has been found with both new perforation 12 (11.85) which is commoner and old perforation 12 (11.95) which is scarcer. It appears that since booklet stamps required less perforating wheels to be used because they have straight edges, the older perforation wheels with older perforator that was still left was used for some of this booklet pane.



Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by jogil - 07/24/2015 10:46 pm
Pillar Of The Community
3859 Posts
Posted 08/08/2015   3:25 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jogil to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Besides 458a having new and old perf 12, there is potential for 454a, 457a and maybe 455a to have both perfs too. These are being checked.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
3859 Posts
Posted 08/23/2015   11:24 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jogil to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
A new addition to add: Canada 405a booklet pane with new perforation 12 (11.85) rather than the more common old perforation 12 (11.95) found on most 405a booklet panes. Also, this new perforation has so far been found in booklet BK52e.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
923 Posts
Posted 08/23/2015   11:11 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add sak to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
It looks like they kept some of the old labour-intensive perforators around, which took two ladies to work, for at least years after the new perforators were introduced. They were probably used when the volume of work got too high - like when producing the main 5˘ definitive booklets (cameo & centennial).
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
3859 Posts
Posted 08/24/2015   10:51 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jogil to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The old perforation 12 (11.95) is on the Centennial 5 cents booklet pane (458a) on the right since the perforation holes are slightly smaller and more clogged up than the new perforation 12 (11.85) on the Centennial 1 cent (454a) and 4 cents (457a) booklet panes on the left. I have been looking into the 454a, 457a booklet panes and 457b, 458b miniature sheets for old perforations but I have only found new perforations so far. I am also looking into 401a booklet pane for new perforations but I have only found old perforations so far. The old line perforation 12 (11.95) has long existed on Canadian stamps from 1861 to 1967 while the new line perforation 12 (11.85) has short existed on Canadian stamps from 1962 to 1972. The overlap between both perforations in the 1962 to 1967 common transition period presents over 20 different stamps with both perforations (over 40 stamps when counting both together).

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by jogil - 08/24/2015 11:17 am
Pillar Of The Community
3859 Posts
Posted 06/13/2022   06:48 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jogil to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The year of 1962 was mostly noted for Winnipeg tagging which was first introduced on some postage stamps in January 1962. It may be possible that this new tagging of some stamps may have led to the faster wearing down of the perforating wheel pins/holes that may have led to the start of their replacement several months later starting in August 1962. Thus, there may be a cause and effect relationship between them.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by jogil - 06/13/2022 06:50 am
Page: of 3 Previous TopicReplies: 36 / Views: 7,255Next Topic  
Previous Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.12 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05