Thanks for the help on these. I suspected Bulgaria and thought I had looked at every Bulgarian stamp in Scott's. Guess my eye is not trained well enough yet.
The translations were particularly interesting as it was the first word on both stamps that had me stumped.
On the first stamp (blue one), I really should have seen that but on the other (yellow gold), I went to #161 as DC suggests but didn't see the exact stamp. I was looking hard for the columns on either side of the stamp.
I do see the stamp with columns and all at #188 but wrong color and this is shown to have stamping on the face that mine doesn't have.
I understand your confusion, as this is a little more difficult to identify.
If you look at your Scott Catalogue, you will see that next to the number "166" is a picture identifier, in this case "A22" This identifies the picture. Go back to the A22 picture and you will see that it is the same. Unfortunately the picture has two colors so it is a little harder to match with your stamp.
Thanks Michael. I am using a 2009 Scott Catalogue and I do see that the photo of the stamp is A22 but that correlates to #161 in my catalog. Are all older stamps the same number in all the recent editions of Scott's? Jim
Scott does sometimes make catalog number changes to older stamps. There is a section in every catalog where they list the changes they've made for that year.
In your case, your 50s stamp is Bulgaria #161 as Michael posted, and it remains unchanged in the 2009 through 2016 Scott catalogs.
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited. Privacy Policy / Terms of UseAdvertise Here