Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1954 US FDC Addressed To Cuba With 3¢ Postage?

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 5 / Views: 2,355Next Topic  
Valued Member
United States
360 Posts
Posted 04/12/2016   12:05 am  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add mcgeesorg to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
This 1954 U.S. FDC addressed to Cuba was, despite the damage, far too appealing to pass up when I saw it on Delcampe.





I ordered it from a seller in Spain, and as an excellent bonus, I quite like the cover that it shipped in, too.





But I'm wondering: how did it get to Cuba with postage equal to the 1954 domestic letter rate? Letter rate to Cuba was 8¢ at the time.





Anyone know?
Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
United States
6756 Posts
Posted 04/12/2016   12:17 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add khj to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Is it possible that the FDC was originally purchased unaddressed. And then the name/address were typed on it to show owner, but never actually mailed?

Don't know about back in the 1950s, but at least in the 1970s through 1990s, there would be companies that provided FDCs either directly to collectors or as souvenirs for businesses to give to clients. You could obtain them either unaddressed or addressed, but they actually never went through the mail system.

Are there any other postmarks on the back?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
360 Posts
Posted 04/12/2016   12:23 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add mcgeesorg to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Hmm, khj. That's a very plausible explanation.

No postal markings, front or back, other than the FDOI postmark, which would tend to support your hypothesis.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
1515 Posts
Posted 04/12/2016   01:10 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Jenny2U to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
FDCs of this period mailed internationally carry a premium but only if backstamped. Otherwise as per khj's explanation.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Moderator
1589 Posts
Posted 04/12/2016   07:06 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add blcjr to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
It seems unlikely that it was carried in the mail stream, but also odd that it is torn on the end, as if opened to remove a letter. But I don't think it has to be that the addressed was added later.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
850 Posts
Posted 04/12/2016   2:31 pm  Show Profile Check paperhistory's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add paperhistory to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
It is too bad that there's no backstamp; you hope to see that in an FDC addressed to a foreign destination. I don't have my rate books at the office but believe Cuba was part of the treaty rather with other Latin American/Spanish sphere countries at the time and entitled to reduced postage (that's the table in the image you clipped).
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 5 / Views: 2,355Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.16 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05