Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Stamps Of King George III Can Any One Put A Value To Them 1870

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 8 / Views: 9,299Next Topic  
Valued Member

United States
293 Posts
Posted 06/04/2016   4:09 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add Kingstonstamper to your friends list Get a Link to this Message










Send note to Staff
Edited by Kingstonstamper - 06/04/2016 7:41 pm

Pillar Of The Community
United States
8956 Posts
Posted 06/04/2016   4:19 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Petert4522 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Kingstonstamper, what does the "1870" in your title mean? The date this thing was mailed is 27 August 1840 if I read the cancel correctly. Come to think of it, that must be 1740?

Peter
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by Petert4522 - 06/04/2016 4:27 pm
Valued Member
United States
293 Posts
Posted 06/04/2016   4:23 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Kingstonstamper to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
No it was not mailed. Im way out in the left on this. this is what I found so far.But no idea of the Value.
The Stamp Act of 1765 was one of the defining moments in the history of North America and the history of stamps. The history of these stamps goes back further than that of postage stamps in the United States. The first postage stamps of the US were issued in 1847, whereas the stamps of the Stamp Acts were issued in the late 1700's. Why were these stamps, the predecessors of revenue stamps, needed?

In the mid to late 1700's, Britain had just finished fighting the Seven Years War in the New World. Despite gaining territories for the Empire, the war had cost them an enormous amount of money, and they needed to make up the amount. Also, the decision was made to maintain an army in the colonies, which would cost more money. The reasoning was that in the event of further uprisings, the army would be there to take action. However, many also believe that the decision was influenced by the fact that bringing the army home would have put too many important people out of work.

More Stamp Act stamps
More Stamp Act stamps
The British Parliament firmly felt that the colonies needed to contribute their part since they had benefited greatly from the protection of the British Army during the war. It was decided that a Stamp Act was the easiest and most efficient way of raising some money, especially since the method had been employed in Great Britain with great success. The decision almost immediately met with opposition. Initially, it was for economic reasons-no one wanted to be taxed…who does? Many also resisted the tax for reasons of principle. British law stated that an Englishman could not be taxed without the consent of his representative in Parliament. The colonists had no representatives in Parliament who could give their consent, and therefore argued that their rights were being violated. What exactly was the Stamp Act?

As mentioned in a previous article, «What are revenue stamps?», it was a law passed in 1765 by Parliament requiring the transfer of all legal documents, permits, commercial contracts, newspapers, will, pamphlets and playing cards to bear a tax stamp. Pre-embossed papers were sent from Britain to be used for these documents and ink stamps were added as well. Individuals had to pay the tax on the document, and then a stamp on the said document showed that the amount had been paid. To further infuriate people, the tax had to be paid in pounds sterling, British currency, and not in the currency of the colonies-making the whole thing an extra hassle. It also didn't make sense, because the money was to be spent within the colonies and go directly to financing the troops. Why not use local currency?

No stamp act reproduction teapot
No stamp act-reproduction teapot
How did the public react? Well, notable politicians argued the matter and wrote many letters and statements to that effect. Eventually, as with most hot political topics, things got out of hand and mob mentality ruled the day. Crowds hung numerous pro-tax politicians in effigy, burned and looted their property, beat them up, and demanded their resignation. They even threatened private citizens who made use of documents with a tax stamp on them to «take care of his house, person, and effects».



Repeal of the Stamp Act
Repeal of the Stamp Act
American Revolution
Protest against the Stamp Act
The result? On March 18th, 1766, Britain repealed the Stamp Act. It seemed as if the colonies had won their cause. However, in 1766, the British Parliament also passed the Declaratory Act. This Act stated that Parliament « had the right and authority to make laws to bind the colonies of America…in all cases whatsoever, even without representation in Parliament». People were so busy rejoicing over the repeal of the Stamp Act that it took some time to realize that the Declaratory Act gave the British government carte blanche to do whatever it wanted in the future. So, other tax laws followed throughout the years, and were met with equal opposition, until finally taxes and duties became one of the contributing factors leading up to the American Revolution.

A little piece of irony: after having fought so hard against these taxes, approximately 100 years later, around the time of the American Civil War, the American government approved the creation of revenue stamps to be used as a tax on documents! What goes around comes around.


Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
8956 Posts
Posted 06/04/2016   4:28 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Petert4522 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
OK, I did not mean to use the word "mailed" but rather "cancelled" in 1740.

Peter
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
293 Posts
Posted 06/04/2016   4:30 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Kingstonstamper to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
It is 1810 not 1870 my mistake Hard to read English January 1810.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
293 Posts
Posted 06/04/2016   4:33 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Kingstonstamper to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Not all of them are canceled.and the Triples only have the metal thing on the first stamp the other two are not pierced or canceled
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
293 Posts
Posted 06/04/2016   4:38 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Kingstonstamper to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
You do have a very good point about the 1740 there is a lot of stamps and cancellations around 25 different pgs with wax seals all on Animal skin paper like the constitution was written on.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United Kingdom
3211 Posts
Posted 06/04/2016   7:20 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add nigelc to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I believe these are essentially the same revenue stamps that were used in Great Britain where impressed revenue stamps were introduced in 1694.

Here, the three parts of the stamps are (1) the stamp itself, embossed on blue paper, (2) a tin staple which was used to tie the stamp to the document and (3) a "cypher" label which was used on the back of the page to cover the ends of the staple.

The cypher labels came in pre-printed sheets which were numbered in each corner. The revenue stamps were usually stamped when required.

There used to be many stamp duties in the UK and I think many collectors will be used to seeing British 2d postage stamps with revenue cancellations from having been used used as as revenue stamps on receipts.

In the UK we still talk about "stamp duty" on property and financial transactions but the taxes that are involved in most cases no longer involve documents being stamped.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Nigel
Valued Member
United States
293 Posts
Posted 06/04/2016   7:51 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Kingstonstamper to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
You are right on the that nigelc. From what I found they go for around 50 dollars cut off the document and up to 4.500 for some. I think I did ok I have around 20 documents each with the blue stamps and some cancellations they have the red wax seals at the bottom where the person put there mark the Christian cross because they could not write . very nice history I think I will get some framed and put them on my wall.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 8 / Views: 9,299Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.17 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05