| Author |
Replies: 1,981 / Views: 247,043 |
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United Kingdom
3211 Posts |
|
|
I see postmasterGS has provided a lot more detail already.  I would agree that for me, your stamp looks much more brownish pink than either brown or reddish-brown. I would normally keep out of colour discussions but this one is fascinating. Rod, could you also post your stamp on the Austrian Post Offices thread to bring that back to life? https://goscf.com/t/57575 |
Send note to Staff
|
Nigel |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
7072 Posts |
|
|
Yvert Classique lists perf 12 as brown (brun), or brown-rose (brun-rose), with a 25% premium for brown-rose over brown (used).
That's a nice stamp. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2941 Posts |
|
|
Rod,
Now that I have access to my hard-copy catalogs, I found the Michel listings that shed more light on the screenshot I posted on the previous page.
Michel lists two shades of the perf 12, brownish pink (MiNr 7ICa) and reddish brown (MiNr 7ICb). These would be the equivalent of Sc 7l and Sc 7a, respectively. So, the MiNr 7ICa shown in the screenshot would be close to the shade of Sc 7l.
As it turns out the MiNr 7IA at the left of the screenshot isn't an exact match for MiNr 7ICb, as it catalogs as brown rather than reddish brown. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Gentlemen, thank you so much for responding with your opinions, The detailed response was fabulous. I shall make up an Album Page for the next caretaker of my collection. I would kind of side on the side of Postmaster, however, alongside my mint Perf 10˝, it may be just a light damaged example. It is further confusing, as my Perf 10˝ itself, does not look "brown" I'll make up a page with your responses, and leave it in the future for the specialists. Nigel : I was a bit dubious with the Postmarks, I have always found early postmasters being prudent with their postal strikes, seeing the existence of 3 hammer strikes, made me a tad cautious. Scans Mint P10˝ and Perf 12.  |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by rod222 - 01/04/2018 03:47 am |
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Quote: Michel lists two shades of the perf 12, brownish pink (MiNr 7ICa) and reddish brown (MiNr 7ICb). Cheers Postmaster. To my eyes, I am very agreeable to the colour "Brownish Pink". |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Updated Page. Mostly unused. Post Offices in the Levant~Austria 1907 Steiner Page 13.  |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Air Post 1934 Steiner Page 60.  Air Post 1951 Steiner Page 55.  Semi Postals 1982 Steiner Page 35.  |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United Kingdom
3211 Posts |
|
|
Hi Rod,
This appears to be:
- SG AD92, an Ankara government postage due from 1922 and
- Scott Turkey in Asia #J2
I say, "appears" as the stamp is supposed to be grey-green but this looks blue on my screen, maybe a green-to-blue colour changeling?
|
Send note to Staff
|
Nigel |
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Quote: I say, "appears" as the stamp is supposed to be grey-green but this looks blue on my screen, maybe a green-to-blue colour changeling? Nigel, "Bingo !" that was my opinion. It appears to be so "Deep Blue" I was cautious. I bought the lot at auction for that very reason, I could not identify it, so had to have it for study. It may turn up in the literature I have purchased. In the top frame line, there is the faintest hue of green. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
First Izmir (Smyrna) Exhibition. 1927 Steiner Page 39.  Silver Overprint.  2 Overprint sizes (Or one is forgery)   |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
674 Posts |
|
|
Definitely weird. (You'll see nice color picture in Isfila - Scott too, for that matter - end of the Turkey in Asia section...)
Color obviously all wrong. Matches the 5 piastre color almost exactly.
Arabic denomination script - lower right circle - wildly incomplete.
Worst - the background in the middle panel - behind the arabic script - should be white?? Not colored in...
Definitely a 'bizarrity' in my definition. Doesn't look like a changeling - or a forgery. If someone coloring in w/a blue marker, well then they have great artistic skills.
Inital suggestion? Hold up to bright light - see if you can see anything. Then maybe put in fluid & see what appears, if anything. That strange toning on the top along a few perfs might also reveal something?? Anything strange about the back?? |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Thank you for your observations, Michael. No watermark, full light yellow gum. Lightly hinged. Nothing held up to strong light. Paper reasonably thin. Here is the stamp, sitting next to his 5 piastre sibling. (The 5 piastre appears to have "63" pencilled on the reverse)   |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by rod222 - 01/04/2018 4:04 pm |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2941 Posts |
|
|
Rod,
Any chance your flatbed scanner can do photo negative scanning? Using that method, I've found you can sometimes spot irregularities or attempts to alter the color of the stamp. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Postmaster,
I have a (dying) Epson V200 photo. It does accommodate negative scanning if I recall, never went down that path, give me some time to find the process, and I'll give it a go.
consideration: Perhaps some sort of Revenue stamp.
|
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by rod222 - 01/04/2018 8:12 pm |
|
Replies: 1,981 / Views: 247,043 |
|