| Author |
Replies: 1,981 / Views: 247,102 |
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Open for interpretation. Sc# 69b 1884 1pi Imperf CV$20. Isfila does not list a singular Imperf only pairs (1000 TL) Opinion: (Part) Isfila #117ES10 Essay Imperforate Pair. (The standard Imperforate pair Isf # 117DE11 is a much deeper blue) Both Scott and Isfila do not price as used (Smyrne Pmk) must consider forged Pmk. "OTTONAN" appears common with these issues.  |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by rod222 - 06/24/2018 11:08 pm |
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
One of 2, Key stamps for Steiner Page 5 1884 Sc#73 1884 A7 25pi Black on Beige Isfila#124 Perf 13˝ DOI : Feb 13th 1886 CV $300 $450 One gap left to fill. Note: I am not comfortable with the shape of the "25" May be a forgery. I have no other 25pi to compare with, also with the dots in the Crescent, I am fairly sure I have an imposter.  |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by rod222 - 06/24/2018 11:21 pm |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
8408 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
8408 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
FT, If you are able to post a scan of your 25pi, that would be nice. 600dpi? I can then toggle with mine, to see any differences.
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
8408 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Assuming mine a forgery, Lots going on, but 2 areas of failure. No shoot on the Arabesque. The "g" figure is totally different.  |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United Kingdom
3211 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Thanks Nigel, and thanks to FT, for the example.
Getting to know these blighters more intimately now. 1. The "Chunkiness" of the "EMPIRE OTTOMAN" is lacking, common across forgeries (usually thinner type). 2. The figure "2" I really find fascinating, the genuine is "top heavy" but I find very attractive, unlike the forgery, which was my initial worry.
Note the last "S" in Piastres ...radical!
"Poof!" there goes $25, but hopefully I can sell the page it came with, and recoup $10-$15
I'll keep the forgery for my records.
|
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by rod222 - 06/26/2018 07:12 am |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United Kingdom
3211 Posts |
|
|
Hi Rod,
Do you have Andreas Borken's volume on this series: "3. Die Empire-Marken"?
It would be interesting to know if he identifies different forgeries.
My only forgery reference for this stamp is in the general series by H. Bynof-Smith which identifies a series of litho forgeries of this set but these have quite different characteristics to these two examples. |
Send note to Staff
|
Nigel |
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Hi Nigel, Quote: Do you have Andreas Borken's volume on this series: "3. Die Empire-Marken"?
Yes I do, Nigel....currently studying it at the moment. Will report tomorrow. Thanks for that other reference, will search for that. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
I think we can fairly safely declare Floortrader's item to be genuine  The 25 Piastre Letterpress ID. Source: Handbuch der turkischen Philatelie. Teil 1: Osmanisches Reich Dr. Andreas Birken 3. Die Empire-Marken Hamburg 2016  |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Quote: It would be interesting to know if he identifies different forgeries.
Hi Nigel, yes he does, both Letterpress and Lithography. Excellent work, just the hurdle of the German Language. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United Kingdom
3211 Posts |
|
|
Thanks Rod.
I'm glad I have the Bynof-Smith set but I've never got over my initial disappointment at the quality of the illustrations.
This volume is the smallest of five and he covers Turkey and the local posts in just ten pages, five pages of bullet points of characteristics and five pages of not very clear illustrations.
|
Send note to Staff
|
Nigel |
|
Replies: 1,981 / Views: 247,102 |
|