Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

R33A ? Your Thoughts

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 3 / Views: 1,759Next Topic  
Valued Member
132 Posts
Posted 11/26/2016   7:34 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add colonelrklink to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Please advise on if this has any chance of being a R33a.
Margins are not conducsive of am imperf.
the pen and ink date shows FEB 17, 62 (according to Boston Book were first printed sept 24, 1862)

provided front and back scan. would someone have back dated this or just wrote wrong date?

Thanks for any guidance and your wisdom.
Colonel



Send note to Staff

Bedrock Of The Community
United States
10594 Posts
Posted 11/26/2016   7:45 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add revcollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Yes, it was backdated. The paper, impression, and time period are correct, but those margins strongly suggest a trimmed stamp.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
132 Posts
Posted 11/27/2016   10:04 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add colonelrklink to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks for guidance, I was fearful of the margins myself. This was in a large mix of used US and BOB stamps. Will put is aside.

Thanks revcollector
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
1151 Posts
Posted 08/21/2017   10:15 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add stampmaster to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Colonelrkink, I have seen on my early revenue cancels, sometimes the "2" is really a "4", don't know if the other aspects "paper, impression, time period" are in tune with 1864 period usage.

Stampmaster

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 3 / Views: 1,759Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.12 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05