Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Ro132B Possible IRS Cancel

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 8 / Views: 1,559Next Topic  
Valued Member
United States
270 Posts
Posted 12/14/2016   9:47 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add rwoodennickel to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
There were three company's/persons who used this stamp. I have seen some MS cancels and a printed M.D. cancel, but not this one. It appears to be IRS. The letters don't seem to align as the R is longer than the S. Anybody familiar with these company's care to take a stab at it??? It would have to be one that was still in business post 1871.



Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
United States
6433 Posts
Posted 12/15/2016   12:00 pm  Show Profile Check revenuecollector's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add revenuecollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Can't tell what the cancel is; there's not enough there. The angle of the second letter with respect to the third seem all wrong for "IRS". If that second letter is an R, it's set at a completely different angle from the S.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
867 Posts
Posted 12/15/2016   12:51 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add revenuermd to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I agree with Dan that it does not seem like an IRS cancel. At the time of the use of these stamps it wasn't even the Internal Revenue Service, but the Bureau of Internal Revenue. Even so, there is no reason for Internal Revenue to be cancelling a private die proprietary stamp!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Ron Lesher
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
10633 Posts
Posted 12/15/2016   3:48 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add revcollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
This might be a stamp cancelled E.K.S. from when E.K. Smith started using them, but before the die was changed to have his name on it. I have not seen one before, but it is a logical reason for it's existence.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
270 Posts
Posted 12/15/2016   8:43 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rwoodennickel to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks folks. I like the EKS possibility. It would be nice to find another example with a better canx to validate that. It could be two serifs from the E that show. I will have to look at it under a strong lens for more evidence. Thanks again.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
10633 Posts
Posted 12/15/2016   9:30 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add revcollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I would like to find one too. It would be an awesome discovery.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
10633 Posts
Posted 12/16/2016   3:54 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add revcollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
A major M&M collector asked me to post this:
I think E.K. Smith is far more likely than any thing else......given the history of the companies involved.....i dont know if they used a provisional before or during the die change over.....if so a comparison might be in order....
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
270 Posts
Posted 12/16/2016   5:40 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rwoodennickel to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thank you Bart, do you know what would it need to be compared to?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
10633 Posts
Posted 12/16/2016   7:27 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add revcollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
An example with EKS if found, I presume. I have never heard of one before, but that does not mean it does not exist. After all, no one had ever heard of an imperf Newbauer & Co. stamp either until that part sheet of 114 was discovered a few years ago.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 8 / Views: 1,559Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.18 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05