Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Dwi Scott 11 Normal? Arabesque

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 9 / Views: 1,473Next Topic  
Valued Member

Canada
74 Posts
Posted 01/15/2017   7:02 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add Michael367 to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Gentlemen,
The full scan is of a DWI 12 cent and the corner scan is of the same stamp rotaed 180 degrees so as better to show the arabesque.
The stamp is, I assume, normal but it sure seems to be close to being inverted. Am I being foolish and picky?
Michael367





*** Moved by Staff to a more appropriate forum. ***
Send note to Staff

Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 01/15/2017   10:35 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Top Left Corner
Left Normal Right Inverted




Inverted frame

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by rod222 - 01/15/2017 10:37 pm
Valued Member
United States
259 Posts
Posted 01/16/2017   03:13 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add tvorog to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Looks like Scott 11 (Facit 11a) with thin inverted frame. Scott value is $175, Facit value is about $225. Since the only variety Facit gives for this stamp is "wtih thick normal frame" (which is not the case here), I would guess that thin normal and thin inverted frames are equally normal for this stamp. Pity that corner perf is missing.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
558 Posts
Posted 01/17/2017   10:41 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Sorsh to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
it's NOT facit 11a, this is 2nd print.. so it would be 11b - neither 1st nor 2nd print could have inverted frame.

trying to catalogue danish or danish bicolored with facit will get wrong results most of the time since it's based on colors - which is determined by the eye of the beholder and we all interpret colors differently.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
558 Posts
Posted 01/17/2017   10:46 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Sorsh to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
print 1 in a strip of 3
the same strip next to a print 2




Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
Canada
74 Posts
Posted 01/17/2017   11:57 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Michael367 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Wow! I am a toddler in a university. Thank you. Should I assume there is no Scott number and that this is a variety Scott does not bother with?
Michael
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
558 Posts
Posted 01/17/2017   12:23 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Sorsh to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
wouldnt know about scott, but it's not a variety, it's simply just 2nd print... perforation suggest it to be 1st vertical row (position 1, 11, 21 and so on) and there is a "variety" in position 41 that has a thick east frame, but the copy I have and the copy from the sheet in the postal museum looks different than yours..

provided with a better picture I could perhaps plate it.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
7072 Posts
Posted 01/20/2017   11:21 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Cjd to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Well there you go...this thread needs a plate-able scan...




(I love Facit for Sweden. I wish I didn't know that it was deficient for Denmark.)
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
259 Posts
Posted 01/21/2017   02:13 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add tvorog to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Well, to me colors of both prints as shown by Sorsh look different from the colors on the initial scan in this thread. It is difficult to judge color variety of a single scanned stamp without being able to compare it with other stamps scanned by the same device in same conditions.

What's the best specialized catalog for Denmark? AFA? The AFA catalog I've seen (don't remember, what year) had no English translations (which is a big minus when one needs to read detailed descriptions, while guessing the meaning of Danish words on the basis of your knowledge of German can be misleading), and values in it were in Danish kronen (a currency that substantially fluctuates against the USD).
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
558 Posts
Posted 01/21/2017   02:54 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Sorsh to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
the best catalogue for denmark is AFA specialized catalogue, but yes it does not have an english translation.
if it had existed online, you could have used a translater.

i don't know about SC or SG.

as for colors, which Tvorog points out, they all look different, which is exactly why facit comes up short. as we all interpret colors in our own way.

print 1 is weak, pale grayish purple, with an emerald green oval.
print 2 is stronger in the purple with a yellowish green oval.

the frame vary alot, the oval is often the best way to tell them apart if you're not schooled in bicolours because print 1 is "maingroup 1,2 and 3" and print 2 is only "maingroup 4"..
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 9 / Views: 1,473Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.17 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05