Perhaps good news, your "Flaw" appears in the 2017 catalogue. ACSC Cat 6d Die llB Number 21(4) e showing Top break completely through, but not the nick in the top right frame opp middle "A"
It is not 4R4. Had you bothered to check you would have noted that 4R4 is a top row stamp but Lawrence's copy does not show a top marginal watermark line which would show on a watermark displaced so low. Also if you had checked the image in ACSC properly you would note that 4R4 has a noticeable thinning of the top margin above L which is not present in Lawrence's stamp.
ACSC seems to have changed something. My 2013 lists 21(4)e as location 4R6 and the listing is specifically written as "Break in top frame over L of Australia". I don't think that is is at all. The closest I see is 21(4)g, but that isn't very close either. Sorry, I still see it as a EFO.
No need to apologise Partime, It's all in the spirit of enquiry. It seems you are correct, It was circumstantial evidence, but looked good to me at the time.
Regarding the Catalogue, you may be distressed to know (apparently) when the editors shuffle in a new occurence, it can shift the other catalogue numbers down. Thereby making older catalogues out with certain references.
Thank you to all that assisted, I have a page for these oddballs in my album I call it the pool room in reference to the movie " The Castle" and these are going " straight to the poolroom!"
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited. Privacy Policy / Terms of UseAdvertise Here
Posted 07/13/2017 11:43 pm
It's all in the spirit of enquiry.
