Nice margins on both--congrats on a good get! I'd say 57L1L definitely. Harder to tell from the photo about 17L2; more than one Plate 2 position has that vertical mark in the right margin.
Thanks. Sorry about the difference in the 2 images, it's my first go with the site's optimizer. I agree with the Plate 2 marks in the right margin but between Neinkins book and the DiPorto site. The Diporto site also shows a vertical mark (not as distinguishable) next to the lower right ornament. Under magnification I can also see that mark on the stamp above which is why I'm leaning towards 17L2.
That 57L1L is a nice one. I don't know how badly you want to know the position of the Plate 2 stamp but it just cannot be 17L2 for the same reason I just gave in another thread. The alignment isn't right.
An aspect I did not take into consideration. I will spend some more time on it later tonight and see if I can nail it down. Thank you for pointing me in the right direction Mr. Sinclair. Hoping nobody posts the proper plate position, I really enjoy trying to figure these out.
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited. Privacy Policy / Terms of UseAdvertise Here