Please Help Identify This Washington, I Think He Is Either Scott 301 Or 319 - Very Confusing

Julie,

Just so you know, I wasn't trying to annoy you with my response. If you look at kcaramat's response, he was a wee bit confused too, mistaking Scott 320 - which is imperforate - with Scott 319.

Please keep posting and feel free to let me know if I ever annoy you with a post again.

Merry Christmas, all!
Greg

Stampman2002 said:



Thank you for your apology and it was totally unnecessary as I feel I am the one who was reading everything the wrong way last night.

I feel that I owe you, Mike and mdroth (and if I forgot someone I apologize again) an apology, I was crackers last night, things struck me wrong for some reason and I got defensive, for that I do apologize. I am horribly ashamed if I caused anyone else any consternation over my misconceptions last night about what was being said.

I do feel like I ask for stamp id's too much here, so today I had a couple of these same stamps to look up (don't recall the number and don't want to guess and make a mistake) so I remembered to go over to stampsmarter.com and looked them up over there on the stamp finder, it was so easy and just great to use.

If I need to post for an id, I will, but I will make every effort including using the stampfinder tools on stampsmarter.com which should keep my id requests down I would hope.

Thank you all for being so understanding and tolerant. And now Merry Christmas to you all, and thank you for being such great people - I really enjoy this group of folks, Julie