Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Is This Considered One Type Of The Bottle Cap Error?

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 3 / Views: 1,306Next Topic  
Valued Member
United States
35 Posts
Posted 01/10/2018   5:38 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add MrQuestion to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
First is the placement on the perf gauge proper at 11 1/4 so I know I'm reading it correctly? 2Nd, I read an article on here about the Washington 220 and 225 bottle Caps error but my book does not even mention it, but this is a different stamp is this one too but on the Scott 554?




Send note to Staff

Valued Member
United Kingdom
299 Posts
Posted 01/10/2018   11:00 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add aug-stamps to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
To me, the perforations look altered from the original. But, hey, I'm a newbie here, so most likely I'm wrong :)
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Moderator
Learn More...
United States
12330 Posts
Posted 01/10/2018   11:50 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add 51studebaker to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The 'cap on 2' (or 'cap over 2') is for a different stamp (Scott #220); not the one shown.
This is a 'cap on 2' design


With regard to perfs, try aligning the perfs this way...



Note that it is not aligning up perfectly with the 11 1/4.
Don
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
1951 Posts
Posted 01/11/2018   08:20 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jkelley01938 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks for clearing that up, Don. I was confused by the initial post.

Jack Kelley
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 3 / Views: 1,306Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.15 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05