Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Any China Collectors Or Experts Here

Previous Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 40 / Views: 3,019Next Topic
Page: of 3
Valued Member
439 Posts
Posted 02/23/2018   12:49 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add dynamode to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
SG1132. Top frame distorted.
SG1155. Top of 5 Deformed.
SG1162b. Kiss print.





Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
439 Posts
Posted 02/23/2018   12:58 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add dynamode to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
SG1474 I think. It has a yellow overprint that I cannot find listed. I can see tiny traces of red. Faded/altered ?. Heavily damaged.


Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
439 Posts
Posted 02/23/2018   1:02 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add dynamode to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
SG1487 with a line top outer margin. Heavy damage.
SG1621 with lines in the outer margins. Double lines visible lower left.
SG1622. This one has a sort of multi curved line running through the building. Also top and left. With a dribble lower right.









Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by dynamode - 02/23/2018 1:31 pm
Valued Member
439 Posts
Posted 02/23/2018   1:05 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add dynamode to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
SG1626. Triangular mark on shoulder and several breaks in the frame lines.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
439 Posts
Posted 02/23/2018   1:07 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add dynamode to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
SG1779. Another one with the top of 5 deformed. This one on the underside.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
439 Posts
Posted 02/23/2018   1:11 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add dynamode to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
SG2010. Part of the left side of the building is missing. The paper looks scuffed, so could just be damaged ?.




Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
439 Posts
Posted 02/23/2018   1:18 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add dynamode to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
And finally.

SG3943(MS). Two stamps used on piece. The lower stamp has a misreg of the colours. making the horizontal lines appear doubled.

I hope you find the above stamps as interesting as I do.



Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United Kingdom
299 Posts
Posted 02/23/2018   1:34 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add aug-stamps to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Dynamode, until Communism took over, I believe Chinese postmasters all over the country were allowed to change the values of the stamps (within reason) to suit the immediate needs. It shouldn't be a surprise to never be able of identifying all surcharges.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
355 Posts
Posted 02/23/2018   5:36 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add TangStamps to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
@dynamode

I think many of these varieties are printing effects or maybe some of them are the common characteristic of a given position in the plating. As far as I know, nobody really did an extensive research on the plating of coiling dragon and later issues. There was some research done of the large dragon, red revenue and some small dragon issues. Nobody even re-constructed the small dragon plating. Therefore, for most of the stamps, only some very distinct varieties are paid attentions to and included in the catalog. So, really, I don't know anyone can answer your questions.

As for the gold yuan overprint stamp, it looks genuine to me. The overprints were added so poorly that many were misplaced in different ways. Your copy actually looks perfectly fine.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by TangStamps - 02/23/2018 5:39 pm
Valued Member
439 Posts
Posted 02/23/2018   7:06 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add dynamode to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
aug-stamps, Tang Stamps thanks.

I would not expect most of the above to warrant a catalogue listing. But you never know. Unitrade lists all kinds of little dots and marks as varieties. Maybe other catalogues do as well.

Maybe this post will tempt people to look at their stamps and compare. They are here now for all to see.

Maybe in a years time someone will say, I have one exactly the same. Lots of maybes.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Page: of 3 Previous TopicReplies: 40 / Views: 3,019Next Topic  
Previous Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.19 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05