Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Any China Collectors Or Experts Here

Previous Page | Next Page    
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 40 / Views: 3,018Next Topic
Page: of 3
Valued Member
439 Posts
Posted 02/22/2018   11:57 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add dynamode to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
A piece with 2x SG196. SG218 pair and 2x SG219. Wuchang registered with a Hong Kong cds for 19th December 1912. The top left stamp has a broken character above post.



Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
439 Posts
Posted 02/22/2018   12:08 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add dynamode to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks Littleriverphil. Good questions.

There are many types of the overprints. I have identified them as best as I can.

The 2 on 192 I think maybe a retouch.

Haha. Thats the cancel on 195 causing an optical illusion.

Same for me with the 127. Only one I have.

Thats all of this series, I will start adding the rest in a couple of days.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
355 Posts
Posted 02/22/2018   5:56 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add TangStamps to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
@dynamode

It is nice to see some varieties here and there. But they are not major varieties. The good catalogs for classic China stamps is the Chan's Catalog and Ma's Catalog. Ma's Catalog used to be the best one but now China Stamp Society becomes the one who updates it every year. Both catalogs cover all the China stamps up to 1949 (Imperial China, ROC, Provinces, Local Post (Shanghai), Manchurian, and Foreign offices in China). But no liberated area. Chan's Catalog is bilingual. Ma's Catalog nos is published in English under the CSS's catalog.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by TangStamps - 02/22/2018 11:08 pm
Valued Member
United Kingdom
299 Posts
Posted 02/22/2018   8:53 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add aug-stamps to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
If I have a good memory - sometimes I doubt it - I kind of remember reading that there was one issue ordered from UK which didn't arrive in time, so the Chinese authorities had to order another batch from Japan. And I believe the ones printed in Japan were of a poorer quality.
The overprints can increase or decrease the value of Chinese stamps based on what the text says: you would need a translation of the text, first! Early postal terminology was based on Imperial Official Mandarin language, so, whoever translates them must be a really knowledgeable person.
Anyway, I would be interested to buy them if they are for sale at a reasonable price Please email me your contact details and I will get back on Friday (today, here in Great Britain)!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
355 Posts
Posted 02/22/2018   11:22 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add TangStamps to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
@aug-stamps

I think the first set of coiling dragon (typographyed, "Imperial Chinese Post" issues) are said to be printed in Japan, but many people doubt it. For later engraved coiling dragons ("Chinese Imperial Post" isses), according to Chan's catalog, were printed in UK. After Ching dynasty was overturned, "Republic of China" overprints were added in Shanghai, but later in UK by Waterlow and Sons.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by TangStamps - 02/23/2018 12:30 am
Valued Member
439 Posts
Posted 02/23/2018   08:22 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add dynamode to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Tang Stamps. Thanks.

I have read that they were also locally overprinted, but are difficult to identify. If they are difficult for the people in the know, then I have no chance.

I have a problem processing the technical aspects of this hobby. I have little confidence in my ability to correctly identify anything, unless its blatantly obvious. Even then I am usually wrong and misdescribe it. I have a large collection of stamps that look different to me, and am trying to organise it.

If like me, you are a non technical flyspecker, you will like the stamps I will be showing here.I will sometimes ask daft questions. But hopefully I will please more people than I annoy.

aug-stamps. Thanks for the offer, but they are not for sale at the moment.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United Kingdom
299 Posts
Posted 02/23/2018   08:24 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add aug-stamps to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Don't worry, Dynamode, every expert of nowadays has been there at the beginning
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
439 Posts
Posted 02/23/2018   11:28 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add dynamode to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
If only it was the beginning. I have been at this for decades on and off.

I am just getting ready to add the rest of the china stamps.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
439 Posts
Posted 02/23/2018   12:20 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add dynamode to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Ok here we go again. If you do not like to see heavily damaged stamps, turn away now, because there are a few.

SG271. The first stamp with a single line lower left. The second with three lines.







Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
439 Posts
Posted 02/23/2018   12:24 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add dynamode to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
SG277. Perfin HS. This one has a horizontal blue line top, and breaking the white margin left below the scroll.



Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
439 Posts
Posted 02/23/2018   12:30 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add dynamode to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
SG316 and 321. Both have thin top frames with breaks top of the white corner circles. 316 also has a scratch through PO of postage.


Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
439 Posts
Posted 02/23/2018   12:32 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add dynamode to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
SG389. This one has a break in the inner sun circle.



Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
439 Posts
Posted 02/23/2018   12:35 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add dynamode to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
SG410 With marks on the hat. SG412 with white areas left of the hat.





Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
439 Posts
Posted 02/23/2018   12:42 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add dynamode to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
SG415 and 416. These have lines left.

I have a sideline collection of stamps with printers lines in the margins. I have not had time to study or organise them properly. Too many.





Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
439 Posts
Posted 02/23/2018   12:44 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add dynamode to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
SG1136 (b). Overprint misplaced slightly high and at an angle. Forgery ?.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Page: of 3 Previous TopicReplies: 40 / Views: 3,018Next Topic  
Previous Page | Next Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.23 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05