Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Quality Control Before 1940-S?

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 998Next Topic  
Valued Member

United Kingdom
299 Posts
Posted 02/22/2018   3:05 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add aug-stamps to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
In another post, I was asking if somebody knows of any sort of quality control in place for US stamps before 1940s.
Do you know of any references to such a process, please?
Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
United States
1317 Posts
Posted 02/22/2018   7:09 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jaxom100 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I am still waiting for quality control for stamps in the 2010s.....
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by jaxom100 - 02/22/2018 7:09 pm
Valued Member
United Kingdom
299 Posts
Posted 02/22/2018   7:12 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add aug-stamps to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
There must be something on the line of 'checklist' before delivery
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
78 Posts
Posted 10/04/2019   3:14 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jallan7982 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I don't for a second think it is 100% applicable, but when I was in the Navy, I filled in for our Postal Clerk when he injured his leg hauling a mailbag down the ladder from the flight deck to the post office area of our Destroyer (ie, he severely sprained his ankle playing flag football). I had to receive stamps (both 'normal' and official) as deliveries, and we always did inventories of stamps, envelopes and funds weekly. All that was ever checked on our 'receiving' end of things was number - did we receive 400 stamps? check. Did we receive 4 sheets of the $0.25 official stamps? check. does the cash till check? check.. ok, see ya next week. Nothing to do with production quality checks, but at an official naval postal station (while there, I stamped the incoming 'Naval Cover' mail with the ships handstamp.. being a collecter, I tried my best to give nice, clear cancels), all we were concerned with was number received matching what was ordered, or expected. They couldn't care less how badly they were printed. This was mid-late 1987, for a frame of reference.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3224 Posts
Posted 10/04/2019   4:21 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add hy-brasil to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Of course there had to be. As an example, #634, the extremely common 2c Washington type I of 1926 that was printed in the multi-millions has only one major error (imperf vertically) that is quite rare.

Do you expect perfection? As jaxom100 notes, the printers are relatively sloppier today. In the period you note, there was no requirement for perfect centering with perfect perfs, if that is what you mean. The equipment quality of the time would not allow that nor was overall production geared to pleasing collectors.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
10632 Posts
Posted 10/04/2019   4:26 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add revcollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I have read that there were 8 inverted center sheets of the 5 cent Beacon; all were caught and destroyed. There were several other sheets of C3a caught and destroyed as well. And most pre-1940 errors are scarce to rare so someone must have been doing a decent job checking.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
12569 Posts
Posted 10/04/2019   4:37 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rogdcam to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
If you are a printing contractor there are technical specs and QA/QC requirements that are a part of your contract and you like to get paid in a timely fashion. If you are the government self performing there are still tech specs and best practices but nobody is going to hold up your progress payment if things are not the best they could be.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 998Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.2 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05