Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

With Wingate Only A Week Away, The Health Of The Rare Stamp Market Will Be Tested

Previous Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 54 / Views: 9,261Next Topic
Page: of 4
Valued Member
United States
319 Posts
Posted 04/29/2018   2:02 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Reedededge to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I was out of town for a week on a business trip, and when I got home, a pleasant surprise awaited me, a package from Siegel; Wingate Lot #32, Scott #5, Pos 7R1E. Here are some images....IMHO, it's a beauty!



Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by Reedededge - 04/29/2018 2:56 pm
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1034 Posts
Posted 04/29/2018   5:04 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rgstamp to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
do you agree with the PF's opinion regarding the cancel. I can't see one in the scan. I messed around with the exposure/contrast etc but I still see only perhaps some shade in cheek or perhaps down shoulder.
But not enough to say its a manuscript cancel. I believe this stamp was thought to be unused for many years and is still controversial?

Congrats on the acquisition.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
319 Posts
Posted 04/29/2018   8:45 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Reedededge to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I spent about an hour with the stamp today before mounting it in my album. I studied it in fluid and under ultraviolet light, and for the life of me cannot see a cancellation. Scott Treple also expressed his doubts. The stamp has been cataloged in the past as unused, so you are correct, there are varying opinions. The bottom line for me, I have been shopping for a #5 that is both within my budget and aesthetically pleasing. This addressed both areas, and I am thrilled to have it in my collection. Perhaps, I will send it back to PF at some point to get a new cert, and see if their opinion changes. Irrespective, it is a beautiful stamp and one of the nicer examples of Scott #5 that has come to the market in sometime.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
540 Posts
Posted 04/30/2018   2:09 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Rhett to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Reedededge, what a great stamp, deserving of your great collection! I think you are right on to enjoy your #5 as is for a few years and then, if you like, test the unused/used waters with a new PF cert submission. My only suggestion is, if you do that in some future year, send it in this time identified as unused. (You would of course disclose the previous cert.) Your 1999 PF cert for it seems to indicate it was submitted as used instead of unused at that time. Might not make a difference but it won't cost you any more to send it in as unused since you will be at the max fee anyway. Regardless of whether the PF deems it unused or used (and they are the right agency to have look at this one), either now or in the future, it is a great stamp and I know you are very proud of it, as you should be!!!!!!!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by Rhett - 04/30/2018 2:12 pm
Pillar Of The Community
674 Posts
Posted 04/30/2018   3:49 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add mdroth to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Congrats Reedededge on a great stamp & an awesome purchase. And it certainly completes a spectacular page. (!)

The page is decidedly unbalanced & very disconcerting - you clearly need another #2 to go in the 2nd row on the top right of the page. If you could get another vertical pair of what I presume is a #7 to go on the right side - to balance the vertical pair on the left - it would be perfect!!

But my biggest question: what do the red stars indicate???
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
5467 Posts
Posted 04/30/2018   4:05 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add redwoodrandy to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Red star indicates the stamp has been certified.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1812 Posts
Posted 04/30/2018   5:39 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add dudley to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Amazing provenance as well.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
319 Posts
Posted 04/30/2018   5:46 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Reedededge to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
The page is decidedly unbalanced & very disconcerting - you clearly need another #2 to go in the 2nd row on the top right of the page. If you could get another vertical pair of what I presume is a #7 to go on the right side - to balance the vertical pair on the left - it would be perfect!!


The pair on the left that you reference is a sound 5A-7 pair (position 5R1E).

...And yes you are correct, the red stars indicate PF certs.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3507 Posts
Posted 05/01/2018   10:56 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add txstamp to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks for posting your new purchase.

It is very hard to find a 7R1E that looks like that, as you know. Great job. Very nice album page as well - that 5-15R1E pair is a really good item.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Page: of 4 Previous TopicReplies: 54 / Views: 9,261Next Topic  
Previous Page
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.14 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05