Not Listed In Scott & Shiu-Hon Chan

Hello,
I have 3 Chinese Blocks but can not find them in catalogue the surcharge ( box with value ) should be at the bottom by catalogue can someone help ?
Thank You





*** Moved by Staff to a more appropriate forum. ***

Is the first one 100 on 28?

If so Sc# 659 1946

$70 on 13 Sc#657A CV $140 ? Good Luck if unwmk.
or #650 if Watermarked

$50 on 21 Sc# 657

Thank you Rod222 but there is one more character on my stamps than on the Scott no's you are mentioning .
Do you have any idea why?

Thank you

Petro,
no I don't, sorry.
I have assumed (which is dangerous) that it was the value of the opt
I do not read Chinese.
I am also a student of the discipline, and I had these as advised.
I recall checking all the types of Scott A46 and these were the only ones that fit.

Hopefully Don or a Chinese specialist can chip in.

http://www.coincircuit.com/Philatel...ext=&page=22


China, 1946, Second Shanghai Union surcharge on Martyr, Peking printing, $70 on 13¢ blue green (Chan 906. Scott 657A), full o.g., Fine to Very Fine, scarce issue.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
We can list Chu Chih-Hsin as follows:
1932-34----Scott no. 318* Blue green,perf.14 (no Wmk.) secret mark:two characteres not joined
1940-41----Scott no. 411 dp yellow green,perf.12 1/2,13 & Comp. (Wmk.261)secret mark:two characters joined
---Scott no. 430 dp yellow green,perf.12 1/2,13 & Comp. (no Wmk.)secret mark:two characters joined
______________________________________________________________________________________
Surcharged stamps

1946-47-----Scott no.650(411) (Wmk.261)
-----Scott no.657A(318)* (no Wmk.) (on Peking Printing)
-----Scott no.658(430) (no Wmk.)

So your strip of three has the secret mark of two joined characters.
We can exclude scott 657A.That leaves Scott no.650 & 658.As rod222 pointed out, Wmk or no Wmk,
that is the question.

Thanks for your help P12.