Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Checking Watermarks On Stamps That Are On Envelopes

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 13 / Views: 2,834Next Topic  
Valued Member

United Kingdom
182 Posts
Posted 01/23/2018   4:35 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add Eiger to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
I have an envelope with a pair of South Africa SG 35b on. Posted to the UK in 1947

The Stanley Gibbons catalogue has them valued quite highly for an inverted watermark. But how do I check that without taking them off the envelope?

For some reason they are CV at £50.00 (2009) for a pair used - and £1.00 for a used single. £650 for the inverted watermark.

Thank you.




*** Moved by Staff to a more appropriate forum. ***
Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
United Kingdom
8579 Posts
Posted 01/23/2018   4:54 pm  Show Profile Check GeoffHa's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add GeoffHa to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I think one of Morley-Bright's watermark detectors may work on covers, but I'm the world's worst at locating watermarks!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
3282 Posts
Posted 01/23/2018   5:13 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Bobby De La Rue to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Hi Eiger,

It can be a lot good photography, lighting and angles.

If the envelope has been opened from the top it will be easier to backlight the stamps. Do you have any of the issues from South Africa from the same time? It may help you in determining how easy the watermark is to see.

As for the catalogue prices, bilingual pairs have always been worth more than singles, since they began to be listed in the Gibbons catalogues sometime after WW2. I've often wondered why but can only suggest collector demand for a pair over a single.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United Kingdom
182 Posts
Posted 01/24/2018   10:34 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Eiger to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks Bobby. I saw in the SG catalogue that they had the CV for a pair but for the rest of the catalogue (99%) they only list the mint and used for a single, so I was surprised the had some showing values for a pair.

Geoff I tried the Signoscope and after a fortnight sold it back on ebay! Now I use lighter fluid and I have a reasonable (!) success rate.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United Kingdom
8579 Posts
Posted 01/24/2018   11:14 am  Show Profile Check GeoffHa's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add GeoffHa to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Morley-Bright - the Roll-a-Tector, from memory - is a totally different product to the Signoscope, and a lot cheaper!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United Kingdom
182 Posts
Posted 01/24/2018   11:17 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Eiger to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I haven't heard of that one Geoff, I'll do some delving
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3154 Posts
Posted 01/24/2018   1:23 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add littleriverphil to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Also look into small very bright led lights, something that you can get inside of the cover. This light is several years old, there are smaller, brighter lights available.


Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United Kingdom
182 Posts
Posted 01/24/2018   1:43 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Eiger to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
They look very interesting! Thank you
And thanks for moving this to the right forum whoever did
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United Kingdom
1255 Posts
Posted 01/24/2018   4:53 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Tim H to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Eiger, I notice you have a marginal copy on this cover. Put a few drops of lighter fluid on the margin and shine a good LED light through from the underside. This should sort it in about 15 seconds. You can buy LED lights with a USB connection for less than £5. Let us know the result whichever means you choose.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United Kingdom
182 Posts
Posted 01/24/2018   6:33 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Eiger to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks Tim I'll give it a go :)
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
328 Posts
Posted 04/15/2018   12:48 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add KGVIStamps to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Based on the usage date, I am wondering if the stamps are not SG 35b (which was issued in 1928), or more likely SG 46c (which was issued in 1936). The design was redrawn three different times, and all are pretty similar.

Look at the edge of the scroll on the right side and notice how the scroll is finished.
SG 35 has some shading in the area. SG 46 has a solid area and some shading, and SG 46c has a different look to the end of the scroll that is like two scroll ends meeting. If you have a Gibbons catalogue, they have pictures of all three variations.

I tried blowing up the image of your cover, but the resolution was too low for me to tell.

Most of the South Africa stamps from this time period were collected in pairs because one was in English and the other was in Afrikaans. Horizontal pairs are more highly prized than singles or Vertical pairs. So if you have a choice buy the horizontal pair.

As you look at most of these issues, you will see that SUIDAFRIKA is unhyphenated on the earlier printing and is hyphenated on the later issues. The 4d is an exception to this rule. So it is a little harder to identify.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
328 Posts
Posted 04/17/2018   2:20 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add KGVIStamps to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I didn't have a scan to show you the difference between the 4d South Africa dies when I made my comment above. Here is a scan that should help you identify the various dies and the corresponding Stanley Gibbons Catalogue number.


Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United Kingdom
182 Posts
Posted 05/01/2018   3:54 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Eiger to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thank you KGVI :) Sorry for late response I am having computer problems!
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United Kingdom
439 Posts
Posted 05/01/2018   5:57 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Noocassel to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I was talking to a laboratory technician about Lighter fuel and alcohols for detecting watermarks. He said the trace of Aliphatic content is not volatile and will remain in the stamp in microscopically small quantities. An anhydrous pure alcohol was his recommendation. Normal ethyl alcohol has a percentage of water. of course I'm talking about Chemicals in the UK, in the USA they might be made to different specifications.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 13 / Views: 2,834Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.2 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05