Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Some More US Postage/Revenue Illegal Usages

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 864Next Topic  
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6434 Posts
Posted 09/01/2018   8:09 pm  Show Profile Check revenuecollector's eBay Listings Bookmark this topic Add revenuecollector to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Just got done imaging these.

First, one that I cannot figure out the rate it's paying. It appears to be just a normal bank check, which should have just been 2 cents. Does the "or bearer" turn it into something else beyond the normal check rate? It doesn't match the inland exchange rates either.

The handwriting of the initials on the stamp matches those of the check's signature line.




Some nice blackjack usages with attractive vignettes.






A doctor's receipt.




Two where the illegal usage was caught, and then proper revenue stamps affixed, in one case on top of the postage stamp.






A bit munged, but an illegal use of Scott #75 on a document fragment with a large oval cancel from the German import house Loeschigk, Oesendonck & Co.




A couple of stamps off document. First a nice blackjack strip of 3. Too bad it's not still on the document, as multiples illegally used are not common.




Scott # 78b (I believe the color is 78b as opposed to 78, but I am not well versed in front-of-book) with a Susquehanna Canal Co. railroad cancel (Tolman S-14).




And lastly a couple of revenue stamps used on cover as postage.

First, a block of 4 of 2-cent battleships plus a single paying 10 cents postage on a Registered Mail cover. Used slightly out of period, but no obvious indicators that the cover is philatelic. Blocks used illegally are almost unheard of, since the usage would have to be international, a heavy cover, or special services in order to justify 8 cents+ in postage.

Nice bold boxed 'Indian Orchard, Mass.' handstamp cancels.




And a nice international cover, caught not by the USPS, but the Italian post, with postage due assessed to the recipient.

Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
6331 Posts
Posted 09/01/2018   8:40 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add John Becker to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The last cover has a NY/T in a circle, thus it was caught by the US and "0" placed above and below the Battleship.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6434 Posts
Posted 09/01/2018   9:04 pm  Show Profile Check revenuecollector's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add revenuecollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
So if it was caught domestically, why was it sent on rather than being held or returned for the missing postage?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
6331 Posts
Posted 09/01/2018   9:20 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add John Becker to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Because they followed their regulations. From page 242 of the 1893 Postal Laws and Regulations (the edition in effect in 1898), section 575.3 and following - shortpaid mail is marked and sent onward.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6434 Posts
Posted 09/01/2018   9:26 pm  Show Profile Check revenuecollector's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add revenuecollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Ok, didn't realize the regs were different for international mail regarding postage due compared to domestic mail. Thanks.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
10633 Posts
Posted 09/02/2018   07:19 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add revcollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The registered cover was sent between two local towns just a couple of miles apart; it was almost certainly a philatelic favor mailing. Also the 24 cent may or may not be a revenue usage. It could easily be a railroad cancel from a cover.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6434 Posts
Posted 09/02/2018   09:03 am  Show Profile Check revenuecollector's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add revenuecollector to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I suppose the Susquehanna Canal Co. could have used the same cancel for both revenue and postal purposes. I have two other examples with the same cancel that are most certainly revenue usages, one based upon the presence of revenue stamps on the same piece, and the other based upon the paper type it is on (ledger paper).

Barring seeing a cover using the exact same cancel, I'll err on the side of revenue usage.



Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 864Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.2 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05