But only if you collect M&Ms, which appear to be the lion's share of the value. The condition of the M&Ms does appear to be comparatively decent though. I doubt I would pay half of Bart's estimate, but I don't do M&Ms.
Not into revenues and probably overstated. Maybe he meant catalogue value? We are pushing up the number of views per hour though, making others look no doubt at what it is they are selling. That adds value for free.
For the most part the m&m's are common ones, although the condition is nice it's nothing to write home about. But they are a decent part of the value. My estimate is about what a retail dealer might pay at auction if he had enough customers to make it worthwhile.
apparently this person read the intro to the m&m section and actually believes it. Clearly he thinks all the m&m's are worth 3 to 10 times catalog. They are not. I have been studying m&m's for 48 years now; that intro might be the most poorly written one in the whole catalog. They couldn't care less.
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited. Privacy Policy / Terms of UseAdvertise Here
Posted 09/20/2018 9:44 pm
We are pushing up the number of views per hour though, making others look no doubt at what it is they are selling. That adds value for free. 
