Scott is absolutely worthless on this question, but Stanley Gibbons does not mention an inverted watermark. Is it common? There is a note in SG that the 4d stamps of this issue appeared generally with watermark inverted. This is the Spray of Roses watermark.
A horribly damaged stamp, but one that will remain in my collection until another inverted watermark comes along. Thanks for any help in confirming the orientation of the watermark.

