Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Any Ideas On Sc. ID???

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 11 / Views: 1,025Next Topic  
Valued Member

30 Posts
Posted 11/05/2018   1:00 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add byrdste to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Hello,

I wanted to see if I could get some help with an ID. Neither stamp appeared to have a watermark when tested, but I know single-line watermarks can be difficult to detect. I thought that meant it's either a 491 or 492, however, the shading on the toga button is clearly light which makes me think maybe I just missed the watermark and it's actually a 444 or a 453. It's definitely a perf 10. Anyone got any ideas??? Thank you!

Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
United States
8956 Posts
Posted 11/05/2018   1:17 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Petert4522 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
It is part of a booklet pane

Peter
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
6662 Posts
Posted 11/05/2018   2:18 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add stallzer to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Doesn't look like any booklet pane I've seen. Both vertical sides are perforated.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
238 Posts
Posted 11/05/2018   2:23 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add pcerio to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Petert4522 It is part of a booklet pane


Stamps from a booklet pane would have a vertical straight edge.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by pcerio - 11/05/2018 2:25 pm
Valued Member
United States
283 Posts
Posted 11/05/2018   2:34 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add craigk to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Looks to me like you've actually got a vertical pair with a horizontal imperf in between, which can be tricky given their propensity for fakes. The only one I can think of offhand is 540a which is a rotary.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Moderator
Learn More...
United States
12330 Posts
Posted 11/05/2018   3:05 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add 51studebaker to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
First thing to check is a fake made from an imperf pair.
Don
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Rest in Peace
United States
1189 Posts
Posted 11/05/2018   6:11 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Stampman2002 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
You need to definitely check this as there are no Type I perforate 10 vertical pairs, imperforate between horizontally, listed in the Scott catalogue.

Looking at the image, which is not very clear, it appears to have the characteristics of Type I. That would make it either Scott 425 (single line watermark) or Scott 463 (no watermark).

A better image would help.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2545 Posts
Posted 11/05/2018   7:23 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add chasa to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
it is the SC 540 part perf, Scott listed, rotary press
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Rest in Peace
United States
1189 Posts
Posted 11/05/2018   7:37 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Stampman2002 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
chasa, that was my first thought as well, but this doesn't appear to be a Type III stamp. If it turns out to meet those diagnostics, that would be the correct catalog number.

The Scott 540 imperf between horizontally is a fairly common stamp pair as it only catalogs $60.00.

Hopefully, the op will provide a better scan which allows determining whether it is a Type III.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
1375 Posts
Posted 11/06/2018   08:09 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add stamperix to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
a Scan would be good, but it appears to be a type III stamp.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1414 Posts
Posted 11/06/2018   5:03 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add cfrphoto to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
chasa is correct. The stamp is a type III vertical pair imperf horizontally. The second line in the left and right ribbons is easy enough to see in the image provided.

For all those who guessed wrong, it would be helpful to point out at least one characteristic supporting the guess.

And, for those who are not following the stamp marketplace, Amos press will inevitably fail unless collectors buy buy more catalogs. Before guessing, check and appropriated catalog. If you don't have one, help the hobby, buy a catalog. For those with limited budgets, this is a good time of the year to find used catalogs for sale.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by cfrphoto - 11/06/2018 5:04 pm
Rest in Peace
United States
1189 Posts
Posted 11/06/2018   10:02 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Stampman2002 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The image I am seeing didn't show the lines in the ribbon well enough to justify T. III. That was why I said a better scan would clear it up.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 11 / Views: 1,025Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.19 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05