| Author |
Replies: 27 / Views: 5,467 |
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
304 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
558 Posts |
|
|
@ Pennyblackie Quote: I really see no point in stamping an R at the back which can easily be forged anyway. Even the back of the one cent magenta is not spared from these horrible marks. the point of the R stamp is to be able to prove that it's the owners stamp (owners mark). there would be no reason to ever forge an owners mark? |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
131 Posts |
|
|
I myself working on stamp 295 shifts are numbering all stamps in my study. hope not to damper values over time |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
131 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
12553 Posts |
|
|
Actually Richar, it can and does detract from the value for some buyers. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Singapore
750 Posts |
|
|
I think owners marks are not as desirable as known expertising marks. If I am the owner of a rare stamp, it does not serve anything by stamping an image of Donald duck behind the stamp if your name happens to be Donald. |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by pennyblackie - 11/26/2018 08:03 am |
|
|
Valued Member
134 Posts |
|
|
Ownership marks do detract from the value. A mint NH stamp with an ownership mark on the back, is not NH anymore. It is not in the form, that it was released from the post office in its day. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1115 Posts |
|
|
In those collections of mine that are strictly MNH, a stamp with ANYTHING on the back, expertizer's mark or not, shall never darken any of my album pages.  |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
7239 Posts |
|
|
The back of the "1c magentai" s great...more appealing than the front.
The word 'provenance' comes to mind. The Google definition is, "a record of ownership of a work of art or an antique, used as a guide to authenticity or quality."
If owners had marked the backs of "inverted jennies" would it have lessened value? I think not. But for lesser stamps it makes a difference in the minds of some people. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3485 Posts |
|
|
The plate position was written on the back of each of the C3a Jennys, I believe. The one that sold recently was position 49, which was still visible on the back, in spite of the stamp otherwise being Unused/OG/NH and a very nice copy.
In this case, since you can't get one that hasn't been marked as such, its hard to say that it detracts from the value. It actually kind of adds to the well-known history of the sheet. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
2941 Posts |
|
|
This really does show how collecting practices can differ. As a Germany collector, I'm used to the German practice of placing expertizing marks on the backs of stamps, and I frequently pay a premium for stamps so marked.
Still can't stand seeing owner's marks on the back, though. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Singapore
750 Posts |
|
|
I think those plate markings on the back of the inverted jennys are in pencil. Expertising marks are always in ink and permanent. I am certain a MNH stamp when marked at the back with ink would detract the value, same goes for the inverted Jenny. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
Replies: 27 / Views: 5,467 |
|