Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

No Logo First Day Issues

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 4 / Views: 910Next Topic  
Valued Member

54 Posts
Posted 11/26/2018   11:36 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add justme to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
First, are these more or less common than the ones with logos on the envelopes. Second, if I were to classify this with a Scott number, would I use the first day cover Scott number or the stamp Scott number?
Thanks, Steve


Send note to Staff

Valued Member
54 Posts
Posted 11/26/2018   11:48 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add justme to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Also, notice the one on the top left address says Hotel Greystone which is in Gatlinburg TN. That makes it interesting.
Thanks, Steve
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
886 Posts
Posted 11/27/2018   02:25 am  Show Profile Check johnsim03's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add johnsim03 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Hi Steve,

These are all common, addressed FDCs. The fact that they do not have a cachet (the proper term for your "logo" reference) make them less collectible. Even if they had cachets, they would be less collectible because they are all addressed. Most FDC collectors want covers with cachets and unaddressed.

There is no separate Scott number for FDCs, so you don't have to worry about that. They are all listed under the stamp in the Scott Specialized Catalog. Except for the early, more valuable ones, the listed Scott value would be for cacheted FDCs which are unaddressed.

Hope this helps a bit.

John
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
1213 Posts
Posted 11/28/2018   11:02 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Kimo to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
As John mentions, these are minimally collectible and most collectors of FDCs, outside of the very early ones, want cacheted and never addressed examples. And most collect according to the cachet that was applied as typically there were many companies and individuals making different cachets for each first day of issue. Some are more colorful and more artfully done than others, some were made in large quantities and some in small quantities. All of this factors into collectability, though for the most part "modern" FDCs, and these would be included in that definition, even with cachets and being unaddressed have rather minimal values, typically much less than Scott Specialized values. The good thing about this is that a collector can buy large numbers of them for minimal cost and assemble a very nice collection.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
53 Posts
Posted 12/21/2018   09:44 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jrc531 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
To confuse the point:
Often FDC collectors utilize a dual numbering system for cover identification. First, the Scott's number, #903 for example = Vermont Statehood. This is followed by a second number, P (Planty) or M (Mellone) number, 36 for example = Dorothy Knapp HDHP FDC.
So #903-36 refers to only one FDC cachet, the Vermont Statehood FDC with Dorothy Knapp cachet.
Of course, one needs to have the two catalogs to communicate.
In addition, on occasion, additional letters or numbers are used for cachet variations or color differences.
Point confused?
Respectfully submitted:
jrc
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 4 / Views: 910Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

  Can Someone Get Too Obsessd With A Stamp?
  I Seem To Be Returning Here After A Long Time Away
  Just Collecting Auctions - Commonwealth Philatelic Rarities - Ends 30 July
  Question Regarding My Grandfather's Stamp Collection
  How Did Engravers At Babn In 1980 Make Changes To An Engraved Cylinder?
  Louisville & Nashville Rail Road CO Postcards And Mail Related Items
  Unusual World War 1 Patriotic War Effort Fundraising Postcards
  Almost There, One More Stamp To Go.share Your Pages Missing One Stamp
  Do You Collect Hungarian Philately With A Judaic Focus?
  Vertical Line Across 2 Stamps Of Bk291
  Difference Between 6096A And 6096B ?
  Need To Know If These Stamps Are Real Errors And Worth Certifying
  Sweden 1.40kr Fluorescent Paper - Interesting Letter
  Patriotic Covers During The Civil War
  Tracking Standard Envelopes? (Imb / Informed Visibility). Intelligent Mail Barcodes.
  Caught In The Mail: Using A "muster" (Specimen) As Postage A Month Early!
  Looking For Ken Pugh Fakes & Forgeries Books / Manuals
  Sending Invoices For Ebay International Orders
  Collecting Aerograms/Air Letters
  #u536 Pre-First Day Cover
  "it's Just Me" Quarterly Stamp Show On August 7th, 8th, & 9th 2026 In Nashville, TN
  Any Info On A Scotts US 65 Imperf On Left
  Any Tips On Identifying Scott 6107 - 6112
  Scott US 406c The Search Continues
  Nashville Philatelic Society-Your Invitation To Our Auction Night Meeting Monday, July 27, 2026

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.17 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05