Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Aden 5˘ Minaret Issue - Scott Vs Sg

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 3 / Views: 745Next Topic  
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
4415 Posts
Posted 12/01/2018   10:39 am  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add angore to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
I noticed that Scott and SG both list 3 issues for the 5˘ Minaret but Scott lists 2 per 12x13˝ varieties and 1 perf 12 variety and SG lists 2 perf 12 and 1 perf 12x13˝.

Now, adding in Steiner pages, they tend to follow the SG listing since they identify one as "yellow green". Scott has green or bluish but you can use the 3 spaces provided either way.

I was more curious on why the difference. I tend to think SG would likely be more precise. I have no issues modifying the page to add another variety.
Send note to Staff
Al

Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts
Posted 12/01/2018   4:00 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rod222 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Al,
Steiner has no leading page for Aden (Authorship) the information may have been made by an Aden specialist, and how he/she had their collection.

It intrigues me how Mr. Steiner came by the vast amount of stamp sizes, for some of the most complex examples, eg: modern Mongolia, Ajman etc.
to be able to build Album page spaces.
Whatever, he made an applaudable record.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
729 Posts
Posted 11/23/2023   5:50 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add danko to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Wanted to post this as a question under a new topic, but found my answer here. It appears there is an error in Scott (surprise surprise). SG is correct in this listing.

On the scan below First two rows are green perforated 12x13.5. Third row are green perforated 12x12. The last row are yellow green perforated 12x12. One thing I don't know if there is a premium for any. Scott list premium (slight) for green 12x12, but it could be for yellow green 12x12 given the error.




Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
4276 Posts
Posted 11/23/2023   8:06 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Parcelpostguy to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Old thread or not, your post greatly improved it.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 3 / Views: 745Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.14 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05