Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Help With A Possible New Newfondland Variety.

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 8 / Views: 711Next Topic  
Rest in Peace
7742 Posts
Posted 03/04/2019   5:27 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add wert to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Guys, I really need your help on this one..Need a good eye.

Left stamp is a known "dog scratch" Scott 56 stamp that I have found
as a "constant variety" in 2015 (along with the Scott 58 also)... As shown in Unitrade, it is ROSE RED (Scott 56) in colour. The stamp on the right may be a Scott 57 which is classified as Scott 57 which is in Unitrade as designated as ORANGE RED.

Please give me some feed back...If I am right, this may be the THIRD and final "dog scratch" variety.

Robert


Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
United States
8956 Posts
Posted 03/04/2019   6:52 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Petert4522 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Robert, why such a small picture - where is the scratch ?
Also, why do you call this the "final" variety,
and thirdly, is the left stamp oxydized ?

Peter
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
Canada
265 Posts
Posted 03/04/2019   6:58 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Trodent to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Hey Wert, the stamp on the right doesn't look "Orange enough" to be number 57 for my eyes.

But technically, if you have found the variety on the Orange/Red (SC56) printed in 1888 and on the Black in 1894/98(SC58) the variety must appear on the Orange 1896 stamp.(SC57)

I would assume they would use the same plate for all issues.

Trodent
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Rest in Peace
7742 Posts
Posted 03/04/2019   7:27 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add wert to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
the variety must appear on the Orange 1896 stamp.(SC57)


Trodent you would think so, unless..unless they noticed the Scott 56 near the end run had a flaw, the proverbial dog scratch..On the run of the Scott 57 they created a new format, and maybe it was say damaged and they said for the third run (Scott 58) hey just said use the Scott 56 process..BIG MAYBE, but one never knows.

But I have been asked by an editor if I had a Scott 57 with the dog scratch. I looked through all mine and only came up with the stamp on the right..Hey, that is why I posted this, that maybe some one out there could produce a Scott 57 with the variety....

But hey, I am happy finding the Scott 56 and 58.

Robert
Peter..here are the 3..First Scoot 56..Second Scott 58..MAYBE third is a Scott 57


Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by wert - 03/04/2019 7:39 pm
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
1637 Posts
Posted 03/04/2019   8:57 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add No1philatelist to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Robert, has it been determined what position in the pane does it come from.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Rest in Peace
7742 Posts
Posted 03/04/2019   9:03 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add wert to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Hi No1philatelist

Position 95

Robert
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
1637 Posts
Posted 03/04/2019   9:38 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add No1philatelist to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Have to mark that down. Thanks Robert.

Mike
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Moderator
Learn More...
United States
5094 Posts
Posted 03/04/2019   11:21 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Partime to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Maybe it's just the poor picture, but the 57 scratch does not look like the same angle and length as the others. Can you see if you can improve the scan?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Rest in Peace
7742 Posts
Posted 03/05/2019   10:00 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add wert to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
the left stamp oxidized

I think Peter is probably correct...Both stamps are Scott 56 "dog scratch" varieties.

Partime..My scanner is getting worse..sorry
Double checked the angle of both stamps and they are equal.

I am going to end this saying, I am still looking for a Scott 57..Any further help or pictures would be much appreciated.

Robert

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 8 / Views: 711Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.16 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05