| Author |
Replies: 14 / Views: 1,680 |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
528 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
677 Posts |
|
|
I'd say they are definitely unused. Go ahead and use them for postage. I have several like this that were stuck inside an envelope. I had to wet the outside of the envelope to get the stamps to loosen up so I could remove them. Of course that ruined the gum and left stains. But the stamps are unused so I'll kust use them for postage.
Dave M. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
1643 Posts |
|
|
Torin, it looks as though your stamps have seen previous postal service on a parcel. It is rather hard to tell on the top block as you did not show a back picture. That said you can see what looks like an erased or light cancellation line extending straight down from the hand of the discus thrower on the top left stamp to just in front of the bow of archer on second stamp. As well there is a line from the heel of the high jumper extending backwards at an angle.
The second strip has definately been cancelled as evidenced by cancellation marks on all three stamps - lines downward in front of discuss throwers as well as numbering evident on the archer stamp.
A word of caution - it is illegal and punishable by law to reuse or attempt to reuse uncancelled postage which has already done it's postal duty. Is it worth the cost?
|
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by No1philatelist - 06/09/2019 10:00 pm |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
7239 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
528 Posts |
|
|
No1 Philatelist: Here is a picture of the back of the block from one of the previous pictures.  Take a look at this Elvis stamp. The front looks normal, but the back has no gum but instead is all white, when normally these stamps had a profound yellow gum.   I will throw away the above stamps and learn not to buy hinged stamps or blocks without asking for detailed photos. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
9 Posts |
|
|
Often times the stamps are used but they somehow don't get cancelled, I have quite a few stamps like this. For me it hardly matters as long as the stamps look good, and I need them for my collection. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
1643 Posts |
|
|
Torin, they are just used stamps, and as Ezeta63 states as long as they are not torn, thinned or damaged they can be put into a collection. Yes the Elvis one probably lost its gum after being soaked free of the envelope, unfortunately it lost a few perfs. Still very presentable as a space filler until you get a better one. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
528 Posts |
|
|
This is a newbie question and it's not facetious. If someone is selling unused blocks or individual unused non-self-adhesive postage stamps, how can one guarantee they are truly unused if there are no cancellation marks? Will a truly unused gummed stamp always lay flat and have perfect gum? How can I as a consumer and collector ensure that the blocks or individual stamps I am buying are truly unused?
Since the motto of this website is "Education is the key to collector success!", I thought I would ask to get educated. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3224 Posts |
|
|
Sorry, but you can't guarantee that you are getting uncancelled stamps when you are buying no gum stamps. There is no magic clue. You can find out after you've bought something without gum by careful examination (as was done here) including putting stamps under UV/black light. Very weak or purposely bleached out cancels can then be seen.
People putting together no gum lots are probably not checking what they get themselves; they're just counting face value. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
528 Posts |
|
|
How about gummed stamps? If an unscrupulous seller were to remove an un-cancelled gummed stamp from an envelope that has been through the postal system and try to pass it off as unused, would there be obvious signs on the gum or stamp that it has been through the postal system?
If someone is selling an individual stamp or a block, should I ask for a photo of the gum on the back to make sure it's perfect and would that guarantee that I am purchasing an unused stamp? |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by Torin - 06/17/2019 4:58 pm |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
707 Posts |
|
|
Not sure what you are trying to ask, but the simple way I look at it is:
No gum is used. (Unless issued with no gum, then have to look for cancel)
Full gum, no cancel, no hinge is unused. Mint Never hinged, post office fresh
In other word not post office fresh - used
Post office fresh unused. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
528 Posts |
|
|
I will use photos as an example of what I'm trying to ask. I just unhinged a 22c Happy Birthday stamp shown in the photo below from #2267-74 – 1987 22c Special Occasions booklet. Based on the photos, how can you all determine the stamp is un-cancelled and never used? I am concerned about buying individual stamps and blocks that someone claims are unused but in reality have been through the postal system, but didn't get cancelled and the seller removed it from the envelope and is selling it as unused. If a seller does this, will the gum change color, get torn, the stamp not lay flat etc.? How is newbie collector supposed to detect this and not get scammed?   |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by Torin - 06/17/2019 7:22 pm |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
8956 Posts |
|
|
The answer is simple. Usually you can not tell from photo's if a stamp has been used but not cancelled. If the seller does not mention this and called them unused I would send them back
Peter |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by Petert4522 - 06/17/2019 7:33 pm |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Canada
707 Posts |
|
|
You can't unhinge a booklet stamp as they were not hinged in a booklet.
I don't think you really want to listen to any one on these boards and many will not reply any more.
No point discussing this any further. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
528 Posts |
|
|
dutchman1948: I apologize if I didn't use the proper terminology. In #2267-74 – 1987 22c Special Occasions booklet, there are 10 stamps, and I removed one from the booklet. I thought that was known as unhinging.
Petert4522: Thank you. I guess I won't be buying individual stamps or blocks for postage purposes since one can't tell from photos if the stamp(s) has been used but not cancelled. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
| |
Replies: 14 / Views: 1,680 |
|