| Author |
Replies: 28 / Views: 2,640 |
|
Valued Member
United Kingdom
71 Posts |
|
|
 Found this error today. Plnny, any body have any info on this? 
|
|
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by theswedish - 09/17/2019 3:21 pm |
|
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Lovely stamp, I plead ignorance on this issue, Gibbons would suggest original state of die, 1850 No frame lines Orange Brown? White round void right of Queen's head? No PLNNY listed "Piecrust" Postmark 1 over V Await experts opinion  |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by rod222 - 09/17/2019 5:24 pm |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
576 Posts |
|
|
Very interesting. Can you tell us where you got it? Does it have a certificate? |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
3282 Posts |
|
|
I just had a look at Lowe's Australasia Half Lengths section and my head exploded  He does have the following note (p.210) "Constant Printing Stone Varieties - Even the most prominent of these may possess, individually, no intrinsic interest but when two or more copies are found of the same flaw the possess real significance, since that class of evidence (over may examples) made it possible to identify the various shades found in the printings from each stone. One may go a long, long way before finding two of anything in this particular field." Emphasis mine. Further, I used Abacus Auctions search facility for the term pinny which produced zero results. https://www.prestigephilately.com/search.php |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
United Kingdom
71 Posts |
|
|
The spelling is PLNNY, not PINNY. I found this on a second edition, tatty, Lalier album, very early. I had to soak the stamps off the pages. I would say the color is red brown. Obviously no certification. It seems quite unusual. Was it an error? The white round void is peculiar. Appears genuine. Purves does not mention. I just wrote to Les Molnar, he may be able to assist |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by theswedish - 09/17/2019 8:42 pm |
|
|
Valued Member
United Kingdom
71 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Bravo! 10 points for posting your query result, helps us all.
Negative: Les did not quote the source, it would be nice to know what reference material it came from.
From a lithographic stone of 12 ? (I think) the first wore badly, hence your flaws, and....all the varieties expressed by Bobby.
|
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by rod222 - 09/18/2019 04:42 am |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
3282 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
1375 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
1375 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United Kingdom
71 Posts |
|
|
Thank you for all your help and a big thank you for the link. To answer the question about the source. Les Molnar is the authority on this, having won gold medals for his Victoria collections and wrote books on it. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
Australia
38679 Posts |
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
939 Posts |
|
|
I'm just curious if there are any reported forgeries for these Victoria stamps? |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
8956 Posts |
|
|
Moyock13, just go to Rod's link above yours. About two-thirds of the way down is quite a list of different forger(ie)s
Peter |
Send note to Staff
|
|
Replies: 28 / Views: 2,640 |
|