| Author |
Replies: 58 / Views: 5,864 |
|
Valued Member
Germany
80 Posts |
|
|
I buyed this some days ago on an auction. It was listed as unused withouth gum and scott 42 with can't be because the two projections on 42 are cutted top and bottom. The price was 200 usd but withouth cerfication. My opinion it could be 28a indian red or 28 b bright red brown? the stamp looks unused and very good condition but withouth gum.    
|
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
652 Posts |
|
|
Offering opinions based on a scan is dangerous, but I think that your stamp is a Scott 28 - Red Brown, Type I. It may have a filled thin or other repair at the top right as viewed from the back - note the white adhesion. It may have a cancel removed due to the darkness around the edges or just be slightly stained. Current Scott Catalogue value for a no gum Scott 28 is $15,000 and as a used stamp $1,050. It may be worth having an expertizer or a good professional in Europe take a look at your stamp. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
10786 Posts |
|
|
It also has a perf added to the bottom. Sixth perf from the left as one looks at the reverse image. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
224 Posts |
|
|
Looks like a Type I #28 red brown to me, (but I don't know what "Indian red" looks like). Definitely one I would consider having expertised. Even with the flaws, it is a nice stamp. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
3224 Posts |
|
|
As wtcrowe noted, this is one of the hardest stamps to differentiate shades. Scans aside, the shade we see varies depending on lighting type and amount. Expertizing is the likely best thing to do, but this stamp should be more carefully checked that there is no cancel, always a problem in this era. Otherwise, the cost may not be justifiable. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
10786 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
Germany
80 Posts |
|
|
thanks for your assesements. I agree that maybe some repair was done reperforated. And it's not excludet that the cancel was removed. but the stamp looks to fresh to me, that this is a used stamp but never say no. @bud indian red has the colour of this stamp (siegel auctions).     |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by stamphunter1 - 09/27/2019 9:32 pm |
|
|
Rest in Peace
7742 Posts |
|
|
stamphunter1 I am no USA stamp expert... And I dont want to look negative, but I noticed a couple of oddities....I put it through one of my Image manipulation software and noticed a couple of things about your stamp. The image on the left ""Dont worry why it is different colours"" brings out what looks like a blob repair...The image on the right shows what looks like a crease to the left of the blob. Just saying..Robert  |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
Germany
80 Posts |
|
|
Hi wert thanks for the input. intersting stuff. But I don't see nothing that look like a crease on the front of the stamp? |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by stamphunter1 - 09/27/2019 9:26 pm |
|
|
Rest in Peace
7742 Posts |
|
|
stamphunter1
Maybe not on the front..Could be some thing as simple as finger nail mark..Not likely, but you never know.
Robert
|
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
United States
10786 Posts |
|
|
That line could be natural to the paper as well; the paper is very thin. |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Rest in Peace
7742 Posts |
|
|
Quote: That line could be natural to the paper as well; the paper is very thin. revcollector makes a good point stamphunter1..You have the stamp in hand..Can you see a line/crease on the back..? Robert |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1414 Posts |
|
|
Has the stamp been dipped in watermark fluid? |
Send note to Staff
|
| Edited by cfrphoto - 09/28/2019 08:42 am |
|
|
Bedrock Of The Community
12677 Posts |
|
|
From left to right are 1856-7 Red Brown, 1858 Red Brown, 1858 Bright Red Brown and 1858 Indian Red:  |
Send note to Staff
|
|
|
Valued Member
224 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
216 Posts |
|
Replies: 58 / Views: 5,864 |
|