Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1½d Red KGV Emu Egg Flaw Stages.?

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 3 / Views: 937Next Topic  
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
898 Posts
Posted 12/10/2019   01:10 am  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add finches to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Crown/A, Perf14.

Wondering if these 3-1½d KGV Reds are progression of Emu Egg flaw. Welcome any/all opinions


Send note to Staff

Valued Member
Australia
156 Posts
Posted 12/10/2019   01:48 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add langtounlad to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
finches

You should have posted full scans of all three stamps for comparison.

However, to comment on what you have posted - the top scan shows known flaw BW88, 89, 90(18)p which are of course from Electro 18 but the flaw you call emu egg is on Electro 23.

On the other two stamps the white flaw is in different positions and do not appear to be related.

Please post all three scans so we can see if 1 and 2 are related.

Regards
Frank
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Australia
898 Posts
Posted 12/10/2019   03:23 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add finches to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Langtounlad,



Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
Australia
156 Posts
Posted 12/11/2019   12:37 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add langtounlad to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
finches

As I stated above your first cliche is from Electro 18.

The third cliche is 23R29 which although not described as such in ACSC is I believe the emu egg flaw. Your copy is almost identical to the one displayed in the Stampboards Wiki.

I am not able to identify the middle cliche but it does not appear to be related to the other two. The white patch under the tail is in the wrong position to be the emu egg. If the numerals 35 in the cancel are a year then it is likely to be a Die 2.

Regards
Frank
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 3 / Views: 937Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.12 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05