You should have posted full scans of all three stamps for comparison.
However, to comment on what you have posted - the top scan shows known flaw BW88, 89, 90(18)p which are of course from Electro 18 but the flaw you call emu egg is on Electro 23.
On the other two stamps the white flaw is in different positions and do not appear to be related.
Please post all three scans so we can see if 1 and 2 are related.
As I stated above your first cliche is from Electro 18.
The third cliche is 23R29 which although not described as such in ACSC is I believe the emu egg flaw. Your copy is almost identical to the one displayed in the Stampboards Wiki.
I am not able to identify the middle cliche but it does not appear to be related to the other two. The white patch under the tail is in the wrong position to be the emu egg. If the numerals 35 in the cancel are a year then it is likely to be a Die 2.
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited. Privacy Policy / Terms of UseAdvertise Here