Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

#492, Critique My Evaluation Requested

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 4 / Views: 1,063Next Topic  
Valued Member

United States
53 Posts
Posted 01/30/2020   4:46 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add jrc531 to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Some other views on my evaluation of this stamp should be helpful.
Scott's #492
2¢ George Washington, regular issue from 1917
unused
perf 10 vertically, a horizontal coil
rotary press - 19+mm X 22 1/2mm
Ph = previously hinged
no wmk was visualized and it has about 50% OG (+ or -)
Type III - two lines in ribbon
I Grade it - Average
A small light blue stain in UL, could that be part of a cancel





Any and all guidance is sincerely appreciated.
Respectfully submitted:
jrc531
Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
United States
577 Posts
Posted 01/30/2020   5:28 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rdavid to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
For what is worth, I don't think the blue spot is part of a cancel.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
1951 Posts
Posted 01/30/2020   6:40 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jkelley01938 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Me neither, but I I would still rate it "fine"

Jack Kelley
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by jkelley01938 - 01/30/2020 6:41 pm
Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
1273 Posts
Posted 01/30/2020   7:01 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Al E. Gator to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
As long as you are sure there's no watermark. Single-lines are deceiving and at times hard to see. Colors on monitors being what they are, the color doesn't seem to have as much Rose to it as most 492s have , tending more toward a 455 color. BUT color isn't the defining factor, its the watermark.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
53 Posts
Posted 02/01/2020   08:02 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add jrc531 to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Thank you very much for your valuable comments.
They are sincerely appreciated.
Respectfully submitted:
jrc531
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 4 / Views: 1,063Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.16 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05