Russian Watermark Question

"These 'Safe' guys also offer a similar digital contraption that counts perfs on any stamp..."

My trust only goes so far on this…not saying it's not accurate.
With the standard 1/2mm acceptance for water content, I don't look to the perfs for ID.

Edit: I do add the perforations, but don't rely on them

I like how the ink has highlighted this one, not sure if it's almost or another partial.

These two are odd to me.

I tried to use full spectrum lighting to reveal WMK#166, didn't work as well as I'd like so I have my doubts on spending the money on a synoscope….

I found my scanner in B&W, kinda picks it up nicely.
Unfortunately, I was under the impression it was a 1200dpi scanner,
but it only seems to be capable of 600dpi, and that won't do.

On a positive note, I believe I have found a #4 to add to my collection,
Most I have spent on a single stamp…..so far, I think I got a pretty great deal on it.
I'll try to send it out for a certificate, just to make sure I'm on the right path.

You should know for sure if it is a 4 without having to obtain a certificate. The 166 watermark is unambiguous and was only used in 1857-1858.

Pretty straightforward in my eyes, but perspective can be a tricky thing…especially when valuables are considered.
That being said,
I wanted it for my collection and didn't want to pay top dollar, I searched around and happen to find one that stood out to me, I paid next to nothing uncertified so even if it turns out to be a #16 I'm up.

There is no 16.

Justfella - I am not playing your stupid games. What catalog are you referencing? Never mind. I could care less.

Can you post a picture of the 4?

One is zagorskiy specialized
Edited spelling

Yup, spelled it wrong….zagorsky

Cdj,
Sorry, not gonna post it, I'm not seeking confirmation,
Just wanted to share my thoughts,

Ever feel bad for getting a good deal? I didn't do anything wrong, but feel like I took advantage of someone who didn't know, I could have sent a message instead I hit bid
Is that wrong?

I just like looking at stamps...as drama free as possible. Including early Russia, Poland and Finland. I'm just interested in seeing your #4.

Unfortunately, you'll have to forgive me.
my experience's here manage my perception of this situation,
without a certificate on something that may be worth more then 50$, It's just bothersome.

Good news for me…found someone that is actually willing to look at somethings I've come across with me, and give me a written opinion! not a certificate but I'd be more then happy with it.
Can't wait.
Off to get a new scanner today, the 600dpi doesn't do what I need apparently:)