Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Does Toning Affect Front Of Stamp?

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 943Next Topic  
Pillar Of The Community
528 Posts
Posted 01/29/2021   7:48 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add Torin to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Apologize in advance if this is too beginner of a question.

Does yellow/brown toning of the gum of a stamp affect the front of the stamp as far as readability of the stamp when it goes through the automated machines? I ask because people generally from humid climates sell unused toned stamps (mainly on back of stamp, but sometimes also present in the white selvage area too) as discounted postage and want to be an informed consumer.

Are toned stamps best adhered via a glue stick?
Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
Canada
1638 Posts
Posted 01/29/2021   9:27 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add No1philatelist to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Should not affect it going through the system if it is a mint stamp with gum. Since they are considered damaged and if they are common stamps it is a great way to get use of them. Just moisten it to adhere, no need to use a glue stick, unless it is a stamp with no gum, maybe previously used, but uncancelled. Then that is a different issue as reusing postage is against laws, but a lot of people do it without repercussion, ultimately your choice.

Edit: As rogdcam mentions it should not be done, and I do not advocate for it either. But it is still ultimately the choice of the particular individual, as to what they want to do with their property (stamps). I or anyone else cannot control the actions of others. It is their own decision to make and bear any liability/consequences for their actions.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by No1philatelist - 01/29/2021 11:17 pm
Bedrock Of The Community
12555 Posts
Posted 01/29/2021   10:09 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rogdcam to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Then that is a different issue as reusing postage is against laws, but a lot of people do it without repercussion, ultimately your choice.


It is not a choice and it is not a victimless crime. Don't ripoff the postal service.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
United States
1565 Posts
Posted 01/30/2021   11:47 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Climber Steve to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
@Torin: "....too beginner of a question..."

In a past life, I taught beginning & intermediate hiking and mountaineering skills to adults. My advice to my students was simple: "the only dumb question is the one that is not asked."
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Valued Member
United States
191 Posts
Posted 01/30/2021   1:33 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add moneil to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Certainly one should not reuse stamps that have been used for postage but somehow escaped cancellation.

The original poster may be referring to a situation where the gum of a mint stamp has become disturbed to the point where it is no longer reliable to ensure good adhesion to an envelope. This might be the case if mint stamps got wet and then dried. The back may still become tacky when moistened but may not seem to adhere as tightly as a stamp with undisturbed gum, and a corner or edge way not adhere at all. Another situation would be if mint stamps became stuck together (which could happen in humid climates) and they need to be steamed, soaked, or sweated apart. Again, while some gum may remain and become tacky with moisture these stamps may need an adhesive amendment (such using a glue stick) to be securely affixed to an envelope.

To give a real life example I heard of (without mentioning any names), a little kid once used a large part of a roll of 3 cent Statue of Liberty or 4 cent Lincoln's to decorate a scrap book, art project, or something and those stamps had to be steamed off the paper. When they were used for postage a dab of Elmer's glue was applied for added security. I seem to recall that the little kid was subsequently introduced to the hobby of stamp collecting so he would have his own stamps to play with.

I have always thought that if a stamp is postally unused but the gum has become damaged it is okay to apply an additional adhesive.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by moneil - 01/30/2021 2:40 pm
Pillar Of The Community
528 Posts
Posted 01/31/2021   02:51 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Torin to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
monell: I am referring to mint, unused stamps where the original gum has become extremely yellow or brown and sometimes the white selvage area has turned a light beige, but the front of the stamps themselves look fine. The original gum is still present, but has toned due to environmental conditions (most likely humidity).

Climber Steve: That's a good adage.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
528 Posts
Posted 02/03/2021   6:23 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add Torin to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The link below is an example of what I mean by toning. It looks like in this situation, toning has affected the front of stamp as well. Would these stamps be able to be read by the automated machines? I don't plan on buying them, but am providing the link below for example/education.

https://www.ebay.com/itm/Block-of-4...AOSwO1Neg6se

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 943Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.48 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05