Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read








Stamp Community Forum
 
Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Is There A Custom Of Adding An Unnecessary 1 Cent Stamp?

 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 2 / Views: 693Next Topic  
Valued Member
United States
77 Posts
Posted 11/19/2021   5:33 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add Letterpress to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
Hi all – In looking at some covers from the 1970s and 1980s, I keep seeing an additional and unnecessary 1 cent stamp thrown onto the letter.

Examples below. These covers have the full first ounce stamp, plus the 1 cent stamp, which is always in the bottom left for some reason...




Note that the covers on that website (PostalHistory.com) for Arizona during this period are dominated by the two recipients above. It looks like the recipient affixed the stamps, not the sender, because there are tons of covers for those two recipients, all with the same placement pattern and with a rubber-stamped recipient name and address. All these senders couldn't have had rubber stamps made for specific recipients. I assume these were SASE envelopes for some business purpose. I'm not sure how being SASE would have influenced the inclusion of the extra cent of postage though.

What do you think was going on here? An extra cent doesn't buy you anything as far extra ounces or services during those decades.

Thanks.
Send note to Staff

Bedrock Of The Community
12555 Posts
Posted 11/19/2021   5:47 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add rogdcam to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I found this in Arthur Rupert's obituary:


Quote:
An avid stamp and postmark collector, Art became a national expert in cataloging community and decommissioned US post offices. He was a decades-long member of the Post Mark Collector's Club (PMCC), and a featured presenter at many of the organization's national conventions. Golf was another passion, and one to which he applied his creative accounting skills. Much to his family's bemused chagrin, the postal service's motto applied to both his rural post office expeditions and all-season golfing forays: "Neither snow nor rain nor heat nor gloom of night..."
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Pillar Of The Community
6328 Posts
Posted 11/19/2021   8:00 pm  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add John Becker to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
The mailers were Rupert and Lund. Purely philatelic.
Up to this era (before it got too costly for most) it was common to collect postmarks from every town in a certain state or states. Collectors like Rupert and Lund would send envelopes under cover to the various postmasters. The inner envelopes would be addressed back to themselves. The extra stamp is hoping to get an example of any second postmark device (like a round dater), but both of these failed in that sense. The one sent back/forth at Tortilla Flat at least got the postmaster to sign it and add her box cancel effectively as a return address.

Add: Here is a group of about 250 covers from Arizona post offices (most of them!) in 1974. In this case, I know there were at least three collectors in the same area doing the same thing. They would get together and combine their three return envelopes in the same mailing to each postmaster. This cut down their expenses quite a bit. The covers for Chandler Heights and Tortilla Flats are at the bottom of the center and right columns.
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by John Becker - 11/19/2021 8:16 pm
  Previous TopicReplies: 2 / Views: 693Next Topic  
 
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page

Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2026 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.31 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05