Stamp Community Family of Web Sites
Thousands of stamps, consistently graded, competitively priced and hundreds of in-depth blog posts to read
Stamp Community Forum
Save Password
Forgot your Password?

Welcome Guest! Need help? Got a question? Inherit some stamps?
Our stamp forum is completely free! Register Now!

Far And Wide Used Stamps - Incorrect Numbering On Selling Sites

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 2 / Views: 375Next Topic  
Valued Member

United Kingdom
96 Posts
Posted 01/21/2022   06:12 am  Show Profile Bookmark this topic Add Rfw125 to your friends list Get a Link to this Message
On purchasing some Far and Wide used stamps, I have been caught out a couple of times with sellers putting the wrong numbers against the descriptions….mostly on 9.2 perf stamps.
When receiving them they are actually the 8.2-8.50 perf which clearly have the 3 joining specs on the perforations top and bottom and are a different number altogether. I now try to enlarge the image on screen and look for the 3 nibs….this is happening quite a lot, even with other of a similar nature.
I recently wrote to a seller and asked him to verify what perf the stamps he was selling and his response was ' I just buy them in and I have not got a perforation gauge that measures less than 10'
I believe in these cases the perf should be part of the description
Send note to Staff

Pillar Of The Community
Learn More...
United States
3402 Posts
Posted 01/21/2022   07:40 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add angore to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
I have seen this when the variety is a suffix of a main number. For many sellers, if they say 114 it could be 114, 114a, 114b, etc. With Scott, the 114a can be the inexpensive value. Most printed albums would just provide one space so it may not matter.

A recent example for me is the Singapore 1990 era insect set. The second printing was by Leigh-Mardon (suffix listed in Scott) but most sellers must not be aware as I get them identified as the non-suffix number. The catalog value of the second printing is higher but from my purchases they do not seem as scare as value may indicate.

Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
Edited by angore - 01/21/2022 07:41 am
Pillar Of The Community
1077 Posts
Posted 01/22/2022   02:09 am  Show Profile Bookmark this reply Add DrewM to your friends list  Get a Link to this Reply
Why would you even buy from a seller that lazy?
Send note to Staff  Go to Top of Page
  Previous TopicReplies: 2 / Views: 375Next Topic  
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.

Go to Top of Page
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Stamp Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2022 Stamp Community Family - All rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Stamp Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Privacy Policy / Terms of Use    Advertise Here
Stamp Community Forum © 2007 - 2022 Stamp Community Forums
It took 0.14 seconds to lick this stamp. Powered By: Snitz Forums 2000 Version 3.4.05